User talk:Ssky007

November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Raymond Arritt (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

If you would be so kind as then to let one know how you could put obviously biased commentary on a topic and then not allow someone to clean it off there. It is quite ridiculous. Most of the current research into the fields of new material research (clathrate models, hormesis, etc.) are proving that there is scientific evidence that not only is there proof for a mechanism of action for homeopathy, and that it has nothing to do with placebo. On top of the studies that were quoted about homeopathy being implausible came out after many studies said that homeopathy is plausible because the researchers could not come up with an explanation as to why there was a reaction greater than placebo. The articles that are quoted came after an article in teh Lancet by Shang et al that was the first article to come out and blatantly say homeopathy is implausible. The problem with the Shang article is they did not even follow proper scientific protocol for the writing of their meta-analysis. Some of the responses to the Shang article are as follows: “The lack of details is unacceptable in a paper drawing strong clinical conclusions.”

“As far as we are aware, none of the studies assesses individualized classic homoeopathy.”

“The 8 chosen homoeopathy trials are not necessarily representative of homoeopathy, homoeopathic practice and its results.”

“To conclude the end of homoeopathy is not backed by the study.”

Shang et al didn’t follow the meta-analysis guidelines published by The Lancet in 1999 and The Lancet didn’t interfere.

So, how do you delete biased information off of an article. Perhaps a new section outside of the introduction to homeopathy. Such as "the unscientific debate pursued by the supposed scientific community" or something to that effect would be appropriate.

Cheers,

SRM