User talk:Ssmith95/sandbox

Hello! I have been assigned to give you a peer review.

I tried to look for your Wikipedia article on Linguistic Universals, but all I could find was this Sandbox page with formatting directions.

Despite this, I can only advise you to adhere to the same standards included in this peer review:

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

Simply put, do remember to include only relevant information, keep an objective (without bias) stance, represent all viewpoints on your topic, include references and citations with working links, and make sure that your sources are academic/scholarly in nature. Hopefully these questions will serve you well in future edits.