User talk:Sspring213

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Lithium 81 (talk) 00:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Generation rx
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Generation rx, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lithium 81 (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Generation rx
I have nominated Generation rx, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Generation rx. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. D ARTH P ANDA duel 02:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. MuZemike ( talk ) 04:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Message to IHeartOscar, Sspring213, and 71.232.77.79
I assume I'm talking to the same person. You need to do three things: Not doing those three things can lead to blocking all accounts.
 * Pick one account, and use only that one. Using more than one account to make it look like you have more than one person supporting is not how we work here.  Please read WP:SOCK for more information.  If, instead, you're two people who know each other and are working in tandem, that's fine, but you'll still be considered as a single person as far as policies go.
 * Stop removing the AfD tag. The discussion will go on regardless, and it's disruptive.
 * Keep civil with other editors.

Now, I also suggest you do a fourth thing:
 * Participate in the discussion at the AfD. Convince people, rather than insult them. See if you can change minds.

Thanks. --barneca (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I give up, I don't know what else to do; it's been explained to you three times you can't remove the AFD notice, and you did it again. I can't think of any other solution than to block you from editing. --barneca (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)