User talk:Ssurjit

Speedy deletion nomination of Glimpses of Koch (Koch Rajbongshi): Fashion, Tradition, Culture, Costume and History


A tag has been placed on Glimpses of Koch (Koch Rajbongshi): Fashion, Tradition, Culture, Costume and History, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Dewritech (talk)  20:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glimpses of Koch (Koch Rajbongshi): Fashion, Tradition, Culture, Costume and History


A tag has been placed on Glimpses of Koch (Koch Rajbongshi): Fashion, Tradition, Culture, Costume and History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from thenativetribe.org/2018/12/17/glimpses-of-koch-koch-rajbongshi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 20:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

I have deleted your article
I havew deleted your article Tradition of Koch Tribe of Assam. The content was all copied from this old document that was published 115 years ago. This material, while now in the public domain, can hardly be considered as a reliable source any more for caste information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

You need to restore the article, You have mentioned that the article is not reliable, The article is published by the King himself and fully reliable, Further reference is cited. The archieve which you had given as reference, is not available in many of the countries, so it is important to publish the article to uplift the community and the topic. You should consider restoring the article instead of deleting it. Further as you stated it is available in the public domain which was published in 100+ Years back and available in public domain, so it does not violate any copy rights and it is in public domain.