User talk:Ssven2/2017 Archives

Happy New Year, Ssven2!


Happy New Year! Ssven2, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thank you very much, Davey. Same to you as well.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Easy archiving
Do you use Firefox? It has an add-on titled "Save URL to Wayback Machine" which does not require you to visit the site for archiving a page (read the add-on description to know more). There is also "Open in Wayback Machine" which opens the latest archive of a URL. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nope, but archive.is is easier for my case in Chrome. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh-ho-ho! Okay! How about this and this? Kailash29792 (talk)  15:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll get that tmrw, thanks.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Burton photo
Replied here. Happened to see this--left again because of the odious stench over infoboxes which has permeated the place for months. Was here checking files to be transferred (making sure they're properly linked, etc. before they go). If anything turns up, I'll let you know re: the photo and do the changes at Commons. We hope (talk) 14:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, We hope. It'll take more than an image fight or infobox fight to make me disappear from Wikipedia. I got nerves of steel, brah.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not that-I hope I can watch my tongue but am continually pulled away from one thing or another I'd been TRYING to do since May. I've found a possible match for the photo at newspapers.com, but the quality of the scan is quite poor.  At times, it looks to be a match and at others, I think the hair isn't "right".  So-I've asked someone who's a Commons admin for an opinion.  Before this can go further, we need to see what he says. ;-) We hope (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * All OK now-see the Richard Burton talk page. ;) We hope (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum
I want it to appear on the main page on January 17 since it is Puratchi Thalaivar's centenary. Since you have experience with DYKs, can you please do something? On an unrelated note, what happened to Jodhaa Akbar GA plans? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Break from it. Will resume in a couple of days. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Film name?
Hi Ssven, just curious about this revert. Was there a problem with the formatting of the Tamil script? I think the user went through a ton of articles adding these templates. There's nothing inherently wrong with the template--it's encouraged at Template:Infobox film--but obviously if there's a problem with the way the editor has delivered the text, that should be looked at. I only speak English, so I'm useless in this venture. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer review/Keechaka Vadham/archive1
Looks like someone else got to it. Maybe next time. Happy New Years.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you misunderstood. THIS IS A PEER REVIEW. NOT A GA REVIEW. You can still post your comments (unless you are busy). HNY to you and yours BTW. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup
Hi! Am not sure if you have notice it or not, but the annual editing competition WikiCup has started and the signup is open till 5 February 2017. The cup encourages content improvement and tries to make editing on Wikipedia more fun; and it did that for me last year. I have hence decided to drop this friendly note hoping that you would take part. Although the signup ends on 5th Feb, the earlier you sign in the earlier you start scoring. Happy New Year and Happy Editing! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

RIP
RIP Om Puri. Sad to hear that he died. I know he was a great actor.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. He was. I haven't seen much of his critically acclaimed films yet. He is good in Priyadarshan's comedies though. RIP, sir ad thank you for the eggs (films) you have hatched (given us). —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not even Ardh Satya? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 07:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Nope. Haha. I will do so soon enough.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I saw the movie long back, and I don't even remember much of the plot. But it was a path breaking film in both (Nihalani & Om Puri) of their careers. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 07:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Indian Sports
The sports articles about Indian athletes are in a appalling state. Do you have any interest in working on it, maybe a specific sport? Let me know, Thanks. Numerounovedant  Talk  08:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I can work on Cricket lists. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, sure if that is what interests you. I recently went through the articles of the sporting bodies in India, including the BCCI. I believe they could use some work as well. Also, off-wiki do you agree with the recent developments with with Lodha panel's suggestions and Thakur's suspension?  Numerounovedant   Talk  08:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. Srinivasan should be gone too IMHO. He's been there long enough. Even after Meiyappan has been banned, he hasn't learnt his lesson. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's funny how sporting bodies operate in India, with BCCI being the only privatised authority. Even with that they have troubles of their own, leave alone the ridicule that the non-cricket sports face. Numerounovedant   Talk  08:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Kattabomman FA may finally happen
Because Danny's book has now been cited only twice in the article (and can easily be removed), I think that makes the article worth for FAC. But before they are mercilessly hacked out, I want you to see if there are alternative sources to support the statements. This already cited source could prove useful. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Danny gone. Now, I'll open up a PR and improve it further before FAC. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Great work. Besides, don't you think info about the 1984 release should be under the "re-release" section? Kailash29792 (talk)  09:23, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

47 Naatkal
Today, the Megastar is making a comeback. If you too are interested in watching the one mentored by K. Balachander at this moment, i recommend you to watch this film. Quite short in length, here is the link. Let me know if you are interested. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Shall do so this evening. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Vijay filmography
A few suggestions: since he has credit as both an actor and singer, you could do something like what it is in Aamir Khan filmography: create a "Credited as" column. Also, it's not "A. R." in Murugadoss, but "AR" (the reason is explained here). The terms "romantic hero" and "action hero" may also be added, with their wikilinks. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've gone with the Shah Rukh Khan filmography format for the "Credited as" part as Vijay has not produced, assistant directed or wrote the script for any film so far. Rectified "A. R." to "AR". Wikilinked romantic hero and will do so for the other. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 12:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * At first I thought "romantic hero" meant a person known for starring in romance-related media (it is still used colloquially to mean that), until I saw this. I also gave you these suggestions since you may want to avoid edit conflicts; there is no In-use or Under construction template. Kailash29792 (talk)  12:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Technically, 'list of songs' should go into the discography page. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Talkback
Do you have any more comments for the FAC? Please talkback. Plus, could you performn the source review, please? Krish |  Talk  18:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That's all from me as far as comments go. Mujhko koi AITRAAZ nahin, dost. I'll take up the source review tomorrow, Krish. Time for me to tuck in now/Get some sleep/Get some shuteye.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 18:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * But don't you think you shave to put your final comments there? The delegates will think that you are yet to reply on the FAC. Krish  |  Talk  18:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * In case you forgot about the source review. Krish  |  Talk  18:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Suriya filmography
Seeing you create this list for a potential FLC (after doing the same for Vijay filmography, which was created after Ajith Kumar filmography was expanded for FLC) makes me think it mirrors this incident (watch from 2:42 to 2:54). Kailash29792 (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Ajith Kumar filmography
Now that the GOCE has finished editing, I believe we may proceed? Kailash29792 (talk) 03:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello!
Hello Ssven2! I do not believe we have talked before on Wikipedia so it is nice to meet you! I have noticed you have been around the block before when it comes to featured articles and lists, so I was wondering if you'd be interested in looking at my current candidate. Feel free to ignore this if you're overly busy; I don't want to pressure you into doing anything. Thank you very much, Carbrera (talk) 23:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC).

Foreign-event pictures at Bollywood Hungama ain't free
Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama at Commons reads, "This permission does not extend to" and gives bullet points under it, one of which reads "photographs of non-Indian events". In this case, no SIIMA image at BH can be used as a free file at Commons. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Paava Mannippu
For a potential FAC, this could be useful. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hey Ssven2, I was looking to improve upon some of my earlier projects. If you find some spare time would you mind taking a look at this? Numerounovedant  Talk  16:17, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll do so within a couple of days.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Numerounovedant   Talk  16:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

My future FLCs
When you last asked me what was the second article I was going to list at the GOCE, I declined to say. Well now I'll tell you, because I think you can help. It is indeed Silambarasan filmography as you earlier speculated, but I can't find sources for the majority of his pre-2000 movies. Can you? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * First, you combine all of his films into one instead of in separate sub-headings. The songs and lyricist parts can go into the main article. Keep the "director" and "voice actor" parts in the list. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That I have no difficulty. As I said earlier, it's sources for his pre-Kadhal Azhivathillai era that I have difficulty obtaining. I also think the list Silambarasan discography should be created. What do you think? Kailash29792 (talk)  10:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Your call. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Andha Naal FAC
The process has begun. May the force be with me and the co-nominator. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Karan Arjun
Hi Ssven2, After looking at your films blog, I found out that you haven't seen Karan Arjun yet. It has two of my favs in one film. However it is your choice. Also do you have a Malayalam section for the films you want to watch.

Thanks. Ryajn3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryajn3 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Rediff source
The source does not even mention the year let alone film. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 11:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I checked both English and Tamil google websites for sources. The only one that mentions him winning the award in detail is IndiaGlitz, which fails WP:RS. As for the Rediff source, I rephrase my edit summary statement here: I have added it again to show which year the state awards for 2000, 2001 and 2002 were conducted as the award ceremonies don't have a separate article like the Filmfare awards or Vijay awards. I'll remove the source though if the citation beside it is good enough. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * While it's good to create new lists be aware of WP:CFORK. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Kamal Haasan filmography
Now the usage of the Vikatan mirror source has reduced to 11 usages. If a film is not mentioned in EIC, do you think it is best removed from the list without gaming the system? What is your say, ? Kailash29792 (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have an idea about the 70s Malayalam films. The website, malayalasangeetham.info, has a synopsis about some of the films with the character names. Maybe we can ask Joseph to get the translation of the synopsis, which is in Malayalam (if he knows the language that is, no offence intended).  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * EIC is a paper encyclopedia. So it isn't exhaustive. 'malayalasangeetham.info' is just a movie database, which again is unreliable. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Then any die-hard fan seeking to taking Malayalam films to GA/FA will be in a big shock: The Hindu B. Vijayakumar (among Kerala's leading film historians) borrows his information about films chiefly from that website. So based on WP:FRUIT, all those articles he published become unreliable, don't they? And can you please define "paper encyclopedia"? I think it means more than a kaagaz ka pustak. Kailash29792 (talk)  09:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Taking articles to GA/FA is subject to availability of quality (reliable sources) on the topic. As for B. Vijayakumar's articles, they should probably be decided on a case-by-case basis. Are the terms, 'paper' and 'encyclopedia', so tough to understand? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 10:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

TNPPL
Guys, you heard/saw the news? What a brave speech from OPS. He's trending like anything right now! No wonder JJ favoured him. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The best thing, IMO, about OPS is he showed no traits of selfishness or egoism, and favoured the common man's views. That is how I expect other Indian politicians to be. Kailash29792 (talk)  17:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * He reminds me of Kattappa. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Vijay filmography
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Vijay filmography has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the FLC.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Twofingered Typist.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome. Happy to help.Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I see you haven't yet created the FLC page. But I think this source could be useful. Kailash29792 (talk)  03:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It says what has already been written in the lead. (He was a romantic hero earlier and became an action hero later). —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Suriya filmography copyedit

 * Thank you for the ce, Miniapolis.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

DAC
This is a major, huge moment in Indian and TN history. Wonder what'll happen now? — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Upon knowing this, I breathed a sigh of relief, believing all the political fiasco that happened since Amma's demise has finally ended. Kailash29792 (talk)  07:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is just the beginning.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Announcement
I am going to make it tomorrow early in the morning. If you are impatient to know what it is, or you need some sort of spoiler, this can give you a clue. Will you be there, my friend? :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The announcement was catastrophic, wasn't it? . Kailash29792 (talk)  03:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I kind of knew Pavan was going to call it quits. Then again, I wish him all the very best in his future endeavours. Om Namo Narayana!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * He was encouraging me to stay when he asked me of my intention after Bradley Cooper's FAC and yet he left this place before me. Wishing him all the best and I will miss him. – FrB.TG (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I pray he comes back sometime later though. One can never really say never. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, who knows? Vensatry came back some 10 days after retiring, and Krimuk came back more than once.  Kailash29792 (talk)  16:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Dilnaz irani
Could you pls add some article to that Dilnaz Irani page.asking fr a deletion of the page due to no source. .am New into Wikipedia edit. Machu700 (talk) 06:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

16 Vayathinile
If it were to be taken to FA, I'd be co-nominator because of how much I reworked the article to cleanse it of Danny's books. Though it seems to have ended up shrinking the article, the number of refs has only increased. Can you see where this source can be used? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  15:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Nothing much there. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Well it mentions Ryan's Daughter, which Danny claimed the movie was loosely based on. That's why I showed it to you. Kailash29792 (talk)  16:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, only Danny mentioned it. You can use the reference in that case, saying "According to Haasan, the film was inspired by David Lean's 1970 drama, Ryan's Daughter." —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge (Indian cinema)
Are we supposed to list contributions only by members? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ask Doc on the WikiProject talk page. If yes/no, then include/remove it respectively. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Althorp
Hi, can you do me a favour and find the archive url links for the dead ones?♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Doc Its been a while! How are things with you, my dear friend? As for the dead links, sure thing.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * We hope has seen to it now I think! How are you? Favourite films of 2016/7?♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Really good, Doc, thanks for asking. Favourite film of 2016 for me right now, still Visaranai. I really urge you to watch it. It'll hit you really hard. Caught up with Arrival today. Beautifully shot. A lot of Kubrick with a bit of Mallick and Don't Look Now (with the flashforwards Adams experiences). I'll see them one by one (a sort of Oscar marathon, I think). I'll see Moonlight tomorrow. Heard it is really good. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, Arrival also has a Tarkovsky influence I think, Solaris influence. Gibson's film also has a clear Full Metal Jacket influence, I'm pretty sure Vince Vaughn based his character on the hard as nails Sergeant (R. Lee Ermey) in that film and Clint Eastwood in Heartbreak Ridge!♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ermey was beautiful in FMJ. His career as a sergeant in Vietnam really helped him there. Vince is like that eh? I'll look at Hackshaw Ridge after Moonlight.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, Vince is just like him in it. Moonlight is also next for me :-)♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Floor test
The TN floor test is quite a ruckus and...if I may make myself so bold, DMK is bringing it on! But it should have been done in a non-violent way instead of damaging mikes and chairs. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Politics is so fucked up in TN, it only does more damage than good. Kailash29792 (talk)  09:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Tame ending now. EPS continues. Stalin is badass though. Shirtless. Already trending on fb and twitter. LOL.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sigh, the baddies won. Everyone could have covered themselves in a bit more glory at certain stages throughout the last few weeks, in hindsight. Waiting to run into Karunas. Editor 2050 (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Haha. Chod na yaar. You're right. I don't mind using language here, but people should welcome those adimais with "open arms".  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 12:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Trans_title field
Don't believe what Vensatry says about this. If he was really right, the "trans_title" field would never have been created. This is English Wikipedia, and everything in a foreign language requires a translation. There were initially no translated titles at Mullum Malarum, but at the ill-fated FAC, someone suggested the translated titles be put and his reason was justified. I also don't know how to convince Vensatry about the importance of adding web archives. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is English Wikipedia, and everything in a foreign language requires a translation. Sigh, why don't you translate the whole article then? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * As for web archives, there is absolutely no compulsion to add the archived urls in references. They are meant only when the original url becomes dead. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If there was an AI powerful enough to give us English-translated articles, we'd use them instead of the non-English originals. And if the original url dies, and we have already added the archive, we add an additional field: .  Kailash29792 (talk)  13:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * We do have Google Translate for that. I don't understand the need to add every single parameter to the references. They are only going to clutter the space. It's perfectly admissible to ignore parameters which are of least importance. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 13:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Travelling
I'll be travelling till March 3, with limited internet access. Can you please help Andha Naal FAC gain more reviewers? Lack of such will cause it to fail. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll do my best.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey
Would you please take a look here. I would appreciate it if you could. 08:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Krish |  Talk
 * I'll look at it tomorrow first thing.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid
 * It's been more than a week. Krish |  Talk  12:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually I wish to place comments after the other ones are resolved. It makes it easier for me.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * What about this? Krish |  Talk  15:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you please review this? Krish |  Talk  11:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Taken up the GA review. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Soggade Chinni Nayana
Hello Ssven2, Soggade Chinni Nayana was originally dubbed in Hindi. The Hindi dubbed version name "The Return Of Raju" which will be premiered on 24 February 2017 in #Zeecinema. Zübæìr (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You can add it in the "Release" section with a reliable source that says it is having its premiere on Zee Cinema like Times of India, The Hindu or even Zee Cinema. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Richard Burton
Hello:

Just a quick note to let you know that I copy edited the Richard Burton article, which I cam across by chance, and added the GOCE tag to its Talk page, the day after you added it to the GOCE request page. I had not realized that you had requested a copy edit until I was going over the request list today.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC) (GOCE Member)

cite book
Do you have access to this source? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, I'm afraid I don't. It is Kailash's idea. It would be best to ask him. If there isn't any other alternative, would it be alright to remove the review altogether?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah okay! In case we have a physical copy of the review, either the page or the chapter number (or at least the title of the article) should be easy find. Else, we are fabricating the source. Can you expand the ref? &mdash; Vensatry  (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I was only able to obtain the dates of each Vikatan review mentioned in Danny's books. Darn, if only he had directly cited all his sources or the Vikatan website archived all its reviews... Kailash29792 (talk)  13:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, that's 'fabricating' the sources - 'illegal' in your lingo. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 06:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Sudharshan1
He appears to be a Vijay/Suriya extremist (by that I ambiguously mean a fan/hater, and not sure which of them he is to which actor). So please monitor his edits on Vijay and Suriya filmographies carefully and think twice before reverting his edits, because there may be some truth in his edits. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Last act
See you on April 9. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Personal attack
Are you nuts? Not sure what made you think I'm a nitwit. If you think I'm a nitwit why beg for reviews? &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * My bad. I should not have done that. Extremely sorry. I lost my cool there. Bit like him back there. Three years into Wikipedia, I should have known better. Again, I'm really very sorry. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

The GA review
Hey! When are you gonna review that article? I will be leaving wikipedia in April or may be mid-May as I will be graduating soon. I will stay away for at least a year or two as I will be very busy at work. I might not even visit occasionally, so it would be great if you could help me with my projects. Thanks. Krish |  Talk  17:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * First thing tomorrow, Krish!. I'm going out this evening as its my b'day today. Tomorrow.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Happy Birthday bro! Have a great one. Krish  |  Talk  07:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Krish!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey! Why wikipedia is looking dull today? Have you noticed or its just me? My wikipedia pages are looking washed up and and kind of shitty. Krish |  Talk  13:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Perhaps because it's a wednesday? Besides, Mondays aren't the only days worth disliking. Kailash29792 (talk)  13:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review bro! I have also nominated Don for GA, you can grab if you want. By the way, I really loved The Conclusion trailer. I know it reveals nothing, still kind of liked it. What about you? Krish |  Talk  10:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'll abstain from GA reviews for now. As for Baahubali 2, I'm planning to see the film in theatres.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at the Mary Kom FLC. Krish |  Talk  13:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I would like to nominated Baahubli FLC but for that I need another review for Amy Adams' FLC. I have asked you like thousand times. That FLC is very old yet not much has happened there. Would you like to review this time? Krish |  Talk  17:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Later today. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 03:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Trans_titles
I believe you can add them back to Vijay filmography, considering you-know-who (not him) will no longer oppose their inclusion. Maybe not to the YouTube links, but to the news articles, i.e. those not written in English. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll deal with those later after the list's FLC. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 12:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Veerapandiya Kattabomman
Now that the PR is closed, when shall it be taken to FAC? After Vijay and Suriya's FLCs are closed perhaps? -- Kailash29792 (talk)  07:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. After that. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

FAC request
Thanks for the support on my FLC! I also have another one open based on the series if you want to take a look. I also have an FAC open for Naruto Uzumaki. When you get the chance, could you review it? If you can't, please reply. Thanks.  MCMLXXXIX  10:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I see both the FLC and FAC has quite a lot of supports already. I'll do a source review for your FAC tomorrow. What say you?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure. Did you think the source review present was inaccurate?  MCMLXXXIX   15:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops. Didn't notice Tintor2's source review there. My bad. I'll do it for the FLC tomorrow then. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It already happened on that one too.  MCMLXXXIX   15:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll comment on both the FLC and FAC tomorrow then.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Would you be able to check for reliability, accuracy, and formatting for the source review on Naruto Uzumaki? The coordinator said that was missing.  MCMLXXXIX   23:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll provide some prose comments this evening as the article has a lot of Japanese references. Find someone who knows about Anime and Manga, particularly from the Anime and Manga Portal. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

D.Gray-man
The FAC D.Gray-man has been copyedited multiple times but a fellow user still finds issues with it. Could you give it a look and or edit it? Muy computer was broken last so I am writing from my tablet which takes a lot of time. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't think I might be able to help you there as I am not much of a copyeditor. You can maybe ask Dr. Blofeld on this. He might be able to help you out.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:30, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

FAC
Hey Ssven2, I just nominated this for an FAC. I was hoping for a fresh set of eyes, would you mind taking a look? Numerounovedant  Talk  06:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Kalidas
I have nominated it for WP:FAR. Please try and get as many reviewers as you can. Meanwhile, if you're gonna take Chandramukhi even further, then this book may seem very useful. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  14:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

NatGeo documentary
NatGeo's documentary on Tirumala is quite interesting. I liked it. If interested, you can watch it with hard-coded subs here ** Pavan Jandhyala **  10:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

He wins again
Mr. 420 has won yet another NFA. I wonder if the system is rigged, or they are incompetent. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  13:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Neerja wins NFA for best film. Kumar wins NFA for best actor. Both films are based on Indian military forces (airways and navy). That might just be a coincidence, or there is a statement behind this. ** Pavan Jandhyala **  14:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, Akki's win was for Rustom and not Airlift (though I would have very much preferred to see him win for the latter). Despite how rigged the system seems, I'm certain COI is not one obvious reason. This incident regarding Balu Mahendra, Ilaiyaraaja and AR Rahman may explain why. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  14:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Why Akshay? Why not Shah Rukh for Fan? Why not Aamir for Dangal? What makes Rustom so brilliant? Don't say COI is absent. No. ** Pavan Jandhyala **  14:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * National Awards for 'Nationalist' films - as simple as that. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 16:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What about Manoj Bhajpai for Aligarh? Lot of people are accusing Akshay and they feel that he might have been favoured because of his support from our Prime Minister. He has definitely joined Saif Ali Khan's league (remember he won for Hum Tum). I would have loved to see Akshay winning for Airlift but they gave it for a joke-of-a-film Rustom, an utterly silly and one of the worst films of 2016. Additionally, Aishwarya Rai was in the final round with Surbhi, this year's Best Actress winner. This combination directs towards a completely hilarious scenario. Where they trying to award the worst actors in worst films? They both fit the bill. Seriously? Aishwarya for Sarbjit? Her performance was panned by every critcs and media publication. She was termed "over the top", "soulless", "screaming is not acting", "miscast" and "fake", yet she was in the final rounds. I wonder what they were really thinking? Krish |  Talk  16:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sarbjit? Definitely an awful choice for even a private award ceremony. ** Pavan Jandhyala **  04:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Shruti Haasan filmography
This is a constructive birthday gift to you by me. Do add a proper picture of her's. I'll take it as a pet project; something that can keep me busy when I'm bored and until work on Bhadrachalam begins. Pavanjandhyala 11:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hope you would throw some comments here. Pavanjandhyala  10:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your birthday gift has become something really purposeful today. It is something we can be happy of. :) ** Pavan Jandhyala **  11:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't quite get you, my friend.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 13:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Shruti Haasan filmography, a birthday present to you by me, is now a FL. :) ** Pavan Jandhyala **  14:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Here is mine: Vijay's and Suriya's filmographies are also FL today. Like Vaiyapuri and Kailash29792 say: Ek maar dho tukda once again.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Lovely news. I am happy too as Bhadrachalam has neared completion (needs lead expansion and c/e though). Recognising your contribution....


 * Thank you very much, Pavan! Seeing a Parrot always reminds me of this Vadivelu comedy scene from Kovai Brothers. Funny one! Thank you again.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Tch. Chutti Killi, Veera Pondatti, Picchi Aambala. If i am right, that should be "Naughty parrot, mighty wife, poor man." Am i right? ** Pavan Jandhyala **  15:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Right.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Baahubali
Would you like to take a look at the film's FLC nomination? Thanks. Krish |  Talk  04:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am still waiting for your comments on this and my other nomination. I hope everything is fine with you. Krish |  Talk  14:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm travelling actually. I'll get back to more active editing by next week.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you back? Krish |  Talk  11:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. I have commented on your FLC. BTW, as a quid pro quo, can you review Dhanush filmography as it has only one review so far. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 13:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, I was reading the same list. By the way, would you please take a look at the Mary Kom FAC, as you had promised? Krish |  Talk  14:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I will tomorrow. Teri kasam. This looks big.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Seems like you have forgotten. Krish |  Talk  15:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Nope. Looking at it now. Going through until the Soundtrack section for today. I'll post up comments there in a few minutes. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please talkback at the FAC. Thanks! Krish |  Talk  07:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Miss Malini
I hate to ask you this but, although I am more than 50% responsible for how the article has shaped up before I plan on taking it to GA, can you please rewrite the plot to avoid copyvio? I had copied it a long time ago when I was still an amateur (but good-intentioned) editor, yet somehow I escaped the wrath of admins. Also, please see how this can be used. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  15:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Movies
Dear Ssven2, Hello! Please do not mistake me for stalking you. I have viewed your movies list several times. However, I want to know how you watch old Hindi films from the 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s, with their restored versions (I mean no cuts in the runtime). Raj Kapoor films have too many cuts in their runtime, and I cannot find the actual copy. I used to use einthusan, but that website is all about money these days, unfortunately. PleaseThank you.

Goonsepic (talk) 18:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)goonsepicGoonsepic (talk) 18:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Mostly through YouTube of course. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki, Wiki
Yenna bro idhu?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Another slap of the face of Wikipedia. Let's party. :( ** Pavan Jandhyala **  08:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I wish the encyclopaedia was not free for all to edit. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  09:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Bro, your thoughts? —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Such things aren't uncommon here, but this is the most disgusting one of all. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 03:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * "Will PM Narendra Modi answer how were Wikipedia pages of a former Prime Minister and Congress leaders altered through a government IP?" — A funny question as anyone can edit Wikipedia but, since its an IP editor in question and Nehruji's article is a protected one, I find that kind of doubtful. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Er, the damage was done as far as back in July 2015, when the article was unprotected. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Its surprising that Wiki did not have an important article like Nehruji's unprotected. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * How many pages can be protected based on their importance? India has so many of such to deal with. :) ** Pavan Jandhyala **  14:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

To be very honest, protection isn't a good thing at all. Articles should be protected only if they are prone to vandalism/content disputes. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 08:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

FAC
Drop by sometime? Numerounovedant  Talk  19:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Puthiya Paravai
I'm sure you noticed the Indian Express review added by me. Like Mutharam, the somewhat pessimistic review isn't very kind towards the Nagesh comedy track. But if I missed something from the review, please feel free to note what. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  10:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Tubelight
Have you seen the teaser of this Salman Khan starrer? How do you think about it? Krish |  Talk  08:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like he lifted his character from I Am Sam, but it looks good. Follow-up to Bajrangi Bhaijaan in terms of patriotic themes. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think patriotism is the new way to fool audiences and Kabir Khan is really good at fooling people. And, don't even get me started on Mr. Salman "Bhai" Khan, the biggest hypocrite in Bollywood. He has been playing the same character in every film, a role of good/clean hearted man to make up for his early real life image. I don't buy this shit. Krish |  Talk  09:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say hypocrisy but he has a caviar nature that inadvertently gets him into trouble. Well, he is after all, a writer's son.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Tubelights are typically associated with unintelligent people. I wonder why Salman Khan would want such a title for his film. There's a reason why he retitled Mental as Jai Ho. -- Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Paava Mannippu
I got a much more in-depth IE review here. See how you can use it. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Thillana Mohanambal
Are you still in touch with Thamizhan1994? I'd like to know if he intends on returning. If he plans on taking the aforementioned article to FA, this could be a useful substitute for sources tracing to Danny, even if the content changes. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  18:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

FLC
I would appreciate your help here. Krish |  Talk  07:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm planning to take a break from reviewing GAN, PR, FAC and FLC after I finished reviewing Dickens's work, A Christmas Carol. So, I won't be able to provide comments. Good luck with your FLC, my friend and fellow Wikipedian.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Shodhganga
This can be very helpful to find sources for older films and other important Indian topics using the thesis they host. Please read this for citing thesis as a source in the articles. ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 17:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Alibabavum Dinamalarum
A source that borrows info from an unreliable source is called a fruit from a poisonous tree. If that Dinamalar article had borrowed from Danny's book (and if Danny's info was taken from us), then it would be unusable. But it did not cite Danny or Wiki as its sources, so it should have been usable. And it also covers additional details, saying the bond between MGR and Modern Theatres broke after the former learnt of the usage of a body double for him (read "இதனால்தான் மாடர்ன் தியேட்டர்சுக்கும், எம்.ஜி.ஆருக்கும் உள்ள தொடர்பு விட்டுப் போயிற்று"). But Sachi Sri Kantha said it was the last film of MGR's contract with Modern Theatres. Nevertheless, I think the source can be used in place of some Danny ones. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  10:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This source is already used in "soundtrack". Do you know how to correctly format it? I think it also contains info on the 1954 Hindi Alibaba film. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  14:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I'll look into it tomorrow. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Ramya Krishnan
I was thinking to watch her films and I have read that her performance in Padayappa was highly praised. Is this its Hindi version? Krish |  Talk  10:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Telugu (dubbed). No Hindi version for Padayappa. But, please don't see the dubbed version. Try to see the original Tamil version here, even if it doesn't have subtitles. You'll understand half of it. See the plot in the Wiki article if you don't get anything.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Surprise, surprise! My link does have subtitles!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How is the film? I know her performance was acclaimed but what about the film? Plus, it has another reason in the form of Soundarya. Krish |  Talk  10:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In one word: MASS! It made me the Rajini fan that I am today. Soundarya doesn't really have much to do. Its Rajini and Ramya all the way. I really don't want to spoil it for you. Enjoy and you'll find out for yourself.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:35, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Ajay Devgn filmography
Hi, recently I nominated the above list for FLC. If you have free time can you leave a few comments here. Thanks in advance. --Skr15081997 (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Paradesi awards
Nice work creating another film awards list, already FL worthy! Regarding the image of Atharvaa, it is 214 × 252 pixels. That is why I removed the 220px text. Putting numbers higher than that gives the image a blurry display. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  10:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Willing to leave comments on both FLCs then?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you should focus more on the lists which are large enough. I mean considering the length of the parent article, the separate article is questionable. I know an editor who will create problem for you here and he kind of did at the FLC. It's just a friendly advice. Krish |  Talk  16:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ssven2, the fork is pretty much acceptable, IMO. It's best to ignore the "advice" of people who do not even have an iota of how things work here. &mdash; Vensatry  (talk) 04:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure Ssven is aware of WP:CFORK. That is why he hasn't yet created an awards page for Vishwaroopam, and even though he seemed to be developing one for Kaaka Muttai, he decided to let it remain in the main article. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  04:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Vishwaroopam is quite big, so a separate article for the awards can be done and plus, my second FLC hasn't received 3 supports yet, so I'm delaying it. Kaaka Muttai isn't big and hence I am letting it remain in the main article.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up, you cannot have more than two nominations at a time. Also, the notability of some awards might (viz., Ananda Vikatan's) be questionable. So take some extra care while creating such articles in future. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 06:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Vensatry, do you know why Ssven has been working relentlessly to improve the Ananda Vikatan Awards page? It's because awards without Wiki articles cannot be mentioned in any article, even if they are covered by reliable third-party sources. That has been proven at Baahubali: The Beginnings awards FLC where The Rambling Man opposed the inclusion of the Vikatan awards simply because they lacked a Wiki article at that time, even though the awards were backed by IB Times. And there has been no conspiracy theory that the Vikatan awards are unreliable, incompetent, or rigged. No award ceremony is more incompetent than this one, which awarded Akshay Kumar for the wrong performance, and two awards' to a charlatan. But if it were finally decided that the Vikatan awards page be deleted because of lack of third-party sources, you would not delete the awards from any filmography table, would you? -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  10:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Audacity?
Look at this and here. A very good director saying something as stupid as this. If that's the case, why not say that films like Chandralekha, Mughal-E-Azam, Sholay and DDLJ are the highest-grossing films of all time, eh? It shows there are a few people who are jealous of Baahubali's success. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * He was very generous. Equally generous are two other knowledgeable men here and here. Read them too, enjoy and celebrate the spirit of criticism. And yes, please do not compare Baahubali with the above mentioned films. What Rajamouli made does not match the brilliance of those jewels. Even "the greatest Indian film of all time" is revered for its German cinematographer's skill and the story (obviously north Indian). What Telugu films are, except a bunch of clowns? My foot.... I said it nah, last time. I am the last exponent of Telugu cinema in Wikipedia. That's all. If ever you find someone like me again once i leave, don't assume him/her as my sockpuppet though. Listening Kailash? eh?  ** Pavan Jandhyala **  09:10, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I know you would never do something cheap like that Pavan. Although Padmalakshmisx seemed like a very promising editor (he does have great editing skills, even if his respecting of policies is weak), his pride and arrogance got the better of him. and he has also proven himself as a master pretender (his display of redemption may have been proven a facade, since he continues to create multiple accounts). <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  09:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Woah, Pavan. Easy. Telugu films are not all like that. Don't degrade yourself and your culture here. Both of that are different from what Sharma said. Both Sarukkai and Bhaskaran actually criticised the film and that's their POV. He was just stupidity from Sharma. Don't feel disheartened. We are there for you, thammudu.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I need not degrade myself and my culture. I had that privilege in my real life in a rather disturbing way. Nobody was like "We are there for you, thammudu" that day. The most polite words that were uttered then were perhaps these: "We Tamilians have the divine in our genes. You Telugus have demons in your genes. That is why everywhere you guys get a fitting response: gulte". How racist? To claim their ancestors as the greatest rulers of South India, some Tamilian friends of mine uttered a line that can make everyone proud of their origins. They called the ancient Telugu lands "whores of Tamil and Kannada rulers". Ridiculing land which helps in human survival? Anyways, i am sorry. I should have been restrained and behaved myself. I apologise to everyone offended by me. Its high time i continue working on Simhachalam. My peace lies there for now. ** Pavan Jandhyala **  11:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Pavan, fanatics and jingoists are everywhere; AP/Telanaga is no exception. We just have to ignore them. Although I do not wholeheartedly agree with both pieces, I see the point the authors are trying to make. Sure, the film had some striking visuals and amazing VFX, but was it pure CINEMA? Heck no! And it needn't be because SSR was very clear about his audience and marketed both films in the cleverest way possible. But what surprised me is the ridiculous perception about the women characters of the film being "strong". In fact, I routinely come across conversations like, "see this is how we (the Indians) used to treat our women in the past" (as if Baahubali happened for real). We even had an article on Avanthika and the creator's rationale was that the character was "strong" (:P) Also as GB says, the film glorifies feudalism/slavery to a greater extent. I know it's a period film but still... As for critics, they can criticise any film because that's their duty. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I know I had said that I would never ever want to talk to that "too good for you" editor but I couldn't resist his laughable remarks. Just to let you know, I had not just created that "Avanthika" article but it was created along with several other articles. It was more based on the popularity of the films/franchise and the coverage it received. And, yes I do feel it is very new for a Telugu film to have a strong female character (Devasena and Sivagami not Avanthika) because Telugu cinema is known for being highly regressive towards women. I have even heard that the big male directors, actors and even small technicians treat female actresses like shit. Just go and watch Radhika Apte's interview. However, now it doesn't came as a surprise because when I saw the comments on several of Anushka's songs (after The Conclusion) I could only find comments like how the users wanted to jack off watching those songs and blah blah blah blah. And, yes it matters because the film atleast changed those filthy comments which were replaced by how beautiful she looked and "female superstar" and stuff. And, coming back to your Content forking comment above, I just want to say that you were the one who complained few years ago that how users were making new lists for the sole purpose of taking them to FL. So, I guess you change your words faster than your shoes. Too bad! Krish |  Talk  17:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

RIP
RIP James Bond number 3! Shocked to hear about the demise of this legend. RIP Sir and thank you for your James Bond films. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It is extremely sad to hear about his death. At least, he managed to live a long and seemingly happy and successful life. Just out of curiosity, which one of his James Bond films is your favorite? For me, I would have to say it was Octopussy, probably because it was one of the first Bond films that I saw lol. Aoba47 (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Mine. I would say Live and Let Die. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * He sure had an interesting life both on and off screen. Numerounovedant   Talk  07:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

FL
Would you please take a look at my FLC. I would appreciate your kind gesture. Krish |  Talk  20:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do read the message on my talk page, bro. Taking a break from reviewing. Good luck with your FLC.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

My peer review
Hi, I know I'm supposed to wait for an interested editor to respond to an article I submitted for a peer review. But will it trouble you if I ask for your comments? I've had two articles requested for PR before, only to get them archived by a bot months later. It's an article I plan to push for the FA status, Drive (2011 film). What do you say, interested? It doesn't have to be today, tomorrow, or the day after that; whenever you like. Here's the page. Thanks a bunch. Blue sphere  03:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey there, Blue. I'm currently taking a break from reviewing as shown on top of my talk page. No offense. Good luck with the article though. Looks good.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. It was only after you gave me a public "thank" did I realize that you've backed out from reviewing as indicated at the top of your talk. Anyway, enjoy the rest of the break. Blue  sphere  04:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Kalki's review of Kalidas
Here is the review. Could you see what to add from it? I've been feeling a little sick to edit since the past few days. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Gemini Ganesan filmography
I'm not sure if you intend to take it to FL or just keep it balanced, but if you are in the midst of making a large edit (albeit without adding an  tag), then you may use these sources for character names:, ,  and Madras Studios (for Missiamma). I hope you know how to add new cells/columns using VisualEditor. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  12:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious two years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Aww, that's sweet of you! Thank you so much, Gerda Arendt.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for calling me above, RIP! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

On a long break
I'll be going out of station tomorrow, and will return on 15 July. Can you please attend to Trisha filmography in my absence? That is if additional comments are made. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  15:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Nallavan (1955 film)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nallavan (1955 film), Ssven2!

Wikipedia editor Jupitus Smart just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Take a look at this when you have the time."

To reply, leave a comment on Jupitus Smart's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Jupitus Smart  12:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Milap (1955 film)
Hi, Instead of creating a new page, you should have completed and/or corrected the old one. That would preserve the history, and avoid creating a duplicate Wikidata entry: Q30136936 and Q30612862. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * At the time, I didn't know there was a page titled Milap (1954 film). I saw it just now.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much...
...for your kind words over at WiR. You make me to blush. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Aww shucks! Thank you too! That's so sweet of you! As I said, proud to be a Wikipedian.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Open Library
Greetings, I have a question on how to use this site: how can I obtain a key to be able to read a protected DAISY? I notice that this book is available for readership albeit locked. I actually need to locate the page number where this is located. (Please ping me when you reply. Thanks) Blue  sphere  15:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * For the Google link, the URL reads "PT222" doesn't it? That denotes "page number 222". As for DAISY, most of it you have to pay (Credit card). —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

List of highest-grossing Indian films
On List of highest-grossing Indian films, you reverted the Dangal figure from 2000 crore back to 1864 crore. There is currently an ongoing discussion about this issue at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films. Could you maybe provide some input there, to explain your edit or address the issues raised? Maestro2016 (talk) 22:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Nadodi Mannan
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Nadodi Mannan has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC) " Thank you, Twofingered Typist.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Nani filmography/archive1
This is my fourth attempt at a featured list. Feel free to leave comments if any. :)  Pavanjandhyala (talk)  18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

New biography on MGR
Seems like a very useful book. Wish Google Books had cited the page numbers. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  14:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. But it doesn't cite them. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 17:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you read the Nadodi Mannan Vikatan review which I pasted on my talk page? There are two people reviewing the film. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  08:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes I did. I think you described the review well on the main page though, showing what's relevant. Keep the review though, don't delete it. We can make changes during the GA review if needed.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nadodi Mannan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nadodi Mannan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pavanjandhyala -- Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nadodi Mannan
The article Nadodi Mannan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nadodi Mannan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pavanjandhyala -- Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Shanti Theatre
I have created a draft for this iconic theatre which, unfortunately, isn't a theatre anymore. Could you help with adding sources? I'll use them to expand the draft before moving it to mainspace. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  07:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll do my best.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey!
Would you please help me here? I had uploaded the widely used posters for Krrish and Krrish 3 and one user kept reverting me and asked for a discussion saying the previous posters were present in the article for a very long time. We all know that posters for Indian films are very hard to find and are not given much thought while uploading it here on wikipedia. I would appreciate your help here and here. Please give your thoughts here. Krish &#124;  Talk  12:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello
Hey brother, I'm finding it tough to add movie posters to the infobox of a movie. Can you please give me any advice on how to do it without gaining any sort of negative attention from the wikimedia commons. It's a sincere request. Thank you. Srinivastarun &#124;  Talk  18:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

VIP 2's Telugu version was filmed, not dubbed
In this interview, Sangeetha Devi Dundoo says "Raghuvaran B Tech was a huge success in Telugu and suddenly, your older Tamil films were being dubbed and released" to which Dhanush replies "Yes, that’s why I felt part two should be a straight Telugu film than a dubbed one." How do we fix this in the article now? -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  10:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Chandralekha FAR
Just a gentle reminder. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  17:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll give it a good reading tomorrow.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I hope it gains more reviewers. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  07:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Biographies of filmmakers
Hello! Just a reminder, the Film project does not cover biography articles. Therefore, the WikiProject Film banner should not be added to articles about actors, directors and filmmakers. Those articles are covered by adding yes to WikiProject Biography instead. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, which means that the Indian cinema task force does not include articles about Indian actors, directors and filmmakers, and consequently should not have the yes parameter on the WikiProject India banner. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Emailed, see asap :-).♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Emailed! You'll love them!♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Please learn to use edit summaries
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manam (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --75.188.199.98 (talk) 15:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Gentleman (2016 film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --75.188.199.98 (talk) 17:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey!
Would you like to review Gunday for GA? I will appreciate your help on this. Krish &#124;  Talk  15:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

VIP "remake"
Why exactly did you remove the information that S/O Ravichandran was the Kannada remake of VIP, despite the statement tracing back to The Times of India? Was it because of this? Perhaps you should have explained in an edit summary. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  13:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Re-added now. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright attribution?
Hi Ssven, I think you forgot the copyright attribution when you split off List of accolades received by Kabali (film). WP:CWW reminder. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * In what way? I don't seem to have copied the heading from the main article. Is it anything to do with the awards table?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Generally speaking, we normally do some kind of attribution when we do a copy/paste of any kind. The easiest way is to use an edit summary when you move the data to the effect of: "Content copied from ____. See that article for attribution." or fill out copied and slap it onto the talk page? Granted, I know that raw facts are probably not specifically copyrightable, but the style and presentation probably are and anyway, preserving the chain of contributor history is typically something we like to do.


 * Anyway, it wasn't my plan to come by to hassle or lecture you because you do a really good job around the project, so I've taken care of this myself. If you could keep the attribution issue in your mind for future copy/pastes, that'd be appreciated. Have a good weekend, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Raga Chintamani
I recently got this amazing book on Carnatic ragas used in Tamil film songs. See how much you can use from it. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  13:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Ssven2. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Madras (film) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 16:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Emailed.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you like to comment on my two FLCs here and here?  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Kohli centuries list
Hi, the table was right actually – "Not out innings" is the primary sort and strike rate/date (in case of ODIs and Tests resp.) is secondary. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 10:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * My bad. I actually thought the scores were to be sorted in terms of date only for both cases.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:50, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is an "unwritten" rule for these lists. :) &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand. BTW, really happy to see you, Vensatry. How are things with you? Good I hope.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? I haven't left WP yet. :) &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 10:55, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I meant in general, mon ami. :) —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW, can you comment on my two Hollywood awards lists, which are up for FLC here and here. Do let me know if you are willing to leave comments there. Thanks. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * :) May be next week. &mdash; Vensatry (talk) 11:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * BTW, MGR's filmography has passed FLC. It is now up for TFL on 17 January. Fingers crossed, I hope it passes the submission requests.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:16, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

RIP
Jisne kaha "Mere pas maa hai!", ab vo zinda nahi hai. Indian cinema ke pas Shashi Kapoor nahi hai! (Meaning: The man who said "Mere pas maa hai!" is now no more!) RIP Shashi Kapoor and thank you for the entertaining films you have provided to us. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 13:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

FLCs
Hi ! Care to check out my current FLCs: List of songs recorded by Syd Barrett and List of songs recorded by Beastie Boys? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

List of Presidents of India
Please review this FLC(Despite asking it is not getting much input) .You seem to frequently put up other articles at FLC and will probably have a good knowledge of them.(I may be busy but will certainly respond by Monday) — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 14:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

DDD
Would you like to review this? Krish &#124;  Talk  22:47, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Reversion
Hi there, your reversion restored incorrect figures, from what I can tell. I see 144.55 crore here, which is cited in the article. As for crore vs millions/billions, that's an uphill battle that none of us are going to win against the multitudes of casual editors who care nothing about Wikipedia preferences. I'm not going out of my way to push crore, but it's just easier to reprint what was in the source than to do the math conversion, which hurts my head and which ultimately seems so futile. Cheerio, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

List of American films of 2017
Surprised nobody has created this yet. The 2018 list should be created too. Can you or help?♦  Dr. Blofeld  13:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Regarding director SUKUMAR's dob
I have enquired himself.. 1971 is his correct date of year. Please update it.. Pavan kumar (sukumar blood fan) (talk) 00:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

nomination actor vijay main artice for featured article
bro can you nominate the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_(actor) main article for featured list like filmography article if possible please do so. thank you--Starunique (talk) 17:09, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * - Vijay (actor) is not a list article, so it would not make sense to nominate it as a Featured List. If you are asking Ssven2 to nominate it as a Featured Article, that would be a different matter, but the article isn't close to FA quality. Even getting it to Good Article status would require a lot of work, and I suspect that much of what you've added recently would wind up chopped. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb vijay is one of the top most actors in india with larger fan base bro so I want this article to be a featured article so please some how make it atleast to a good article level with your master editing skills. thank you--Starunique (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2 how about you bro?? vijay main article to a featured article can you??--Starunique (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm currently quite busy with real life. As of now I can't perform such a big undertaking. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2 can this song article of vijay https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_discography be made into a featured list as it is a small article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starunique (talk • contribs) 08:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your call. You can do it yourself. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:11, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2 bro Vijay discography article done kindly check for errorsStarunique (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Still not good enough, . Try to use other discography articles as reference (try this, under the section "Article discographies"). —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

 * Thank you very much, 7&amp;6=thirteen. That's very kind.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Help
Would you like to review this? Please don't decline as someone inexperienced opened it and has now asked others to take over. I would appreciate your gesture. Thanks. Krish &#124;  Talk  13:18, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

And a Happy New Yeeeeeeear
...ahem. Sorry. Blew my voice out caroling the other night. :-)

Thanks very much for the lovely thought; 'tis greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work, and happy editing into 2018 and beyond! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Aww. So sweet of you, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. Same to you too!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Ssven2. I'm just posting to let you know that M. G. Ramachandran filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 15, 2018. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Giants2008. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours in advance.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:01, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Best wishes for the holidays...
Thank you very much, Johnbod. That's very kind. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Puthiya Paravai
Sorry for the removal of that content. I contemplated taking the article to FA, and among the things I recollected at Mullum Malarum's botched FAC was that you can't use statements like "the film inspired the title of a TV series" unless the source actually says it was so. None of the sources (Sify and Dinamalar) mention the Kushboo serial's connection to the Puthiya Paravai song. -- <b style="color:black;">Kailash29792</b> (talk)  08:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!
Lovely candle there. Symbolises the light to remove the darkness. Thank you very much for this gesture, William Harris. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." - attributed to Confucius! William Harris •   (talk) •  09:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "tamaso mā jyotir gamaya" ("Lead me from darkness to light") - Attributed to the Pavamana Mantra under section 1.3.28 of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Likewise, William Harris.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:gold; background-color:lightgreen; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Martinevans123 (Santa's Drop-in Centre) ... sends you ... ... warmest seasonal wishes for ...... Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda.

Hoping that Christmas may bless you with peace, love and understanding... and wishing that you have a good run in 2018!!
 * Diolch yn fawr, Martinevans123! Ystum hyfryd.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-radius: 32px; border-color:#009600; background: #FFFBC4; border-width:8px; text-align:center; padding:7px; height:210px;" class="plainlinks"> Merry Christmas !!

Hi, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 14:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC) Thank you very much, Davey2010. That's very kind. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Bzuk. That's very kind. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 16:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Thank you very much, CAPTAIN RAJU. That's very kind of you! — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Christmas greetings
Wishing you all the best for 2018 and beyond! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, gracias, merci beaucoup, arigato, xie xie nin, shukriya, nandri and thank you, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! That's very kind of you!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Season's greetings
Hi Srinivas, thanks for the card, and Merry Christmas to you. SarahSV (talk) 02:48, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Sarah. That's very kind of you!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

 * Thank you very much, Adityavagarwal. That's very kind of you!  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Ssven2: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, the Winter or Summer Solstice, Quviahugvik, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Adapted from Season's Greetings
 * That is so sweet of you, CambridgeBayWeather. Thank you for this lovely gesture.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 11:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Heddwch ac ewyllys da

 * That is so sweet of you, Mr. Jones. Thank you for this lovely gesture.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 * Here is one for your talk page Sven2. I only made it through half the alphabet in my deliveries before sleep over took me last night :-) Best wishes. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Aww, MarnetteD. Thank you for this lovely gesture. Very kind.  —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 06:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: TonyBallioni (talk) 07:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
 * Thank you very much, TonyBallioni. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Ssven2. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ASsven2 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thank you very much, Widr. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)