User talk:StAnselm/2010

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Complementarianism
Greeting, StAnselm. I'm not looking for a 3RR or a dispute. I just found (first time) the article Biblical patriarchy and was editing that addition in the Complementarianism article in lieu of just Patriarchy. Then I noticed your rv's comments: " a)rights are not the same as worth, b)this is "within feminist theory" - if you want to discuss it further, let's do it on the talk page)." I don't understand your point. There is a subtle difference between Complementarianism and Biblical patriarchy, and it is precisely this point: worth, or value, or maybe there's a better word. Sometimes it's a matter of believe that males are more competent. However, I ask you to consider some variation on this theme for this significant point. It's very important, IMO, to clearly distinguish Compl from (biblical or other) patriarchy. I'm open to learn from you. Thanks and apologies for not getting this to you before the new edit. ─AFAprof01 (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Greetings St. Anselm, I too have noticed the addition. I am wondering if B.P. has the same notability as the other 3 positions. In other words, does it have an official statement, a list of notable adherents, a sizeable volume of literature, a flagship organisation, etc. etc. Do people who identify as Biblical Patriarchalists engage with the other positions in debate? And importantly, do the other positions (especially comp.) acknowledge B.P. as a position with distinct views from their own?


 * My initial hunch (which could be wrong) is that B.P. is just a subset of Complementarianism, who would basically subscribe to the Danvers Statement, the position of CBMW and so on. For example, John Piper, who is a prominent Complementarian, remarked last year that the Commander in Chief of the USA -- a civil position -- should not be a woman (i.e. Hilary Clinton). I suspect that many complementarians would hold this view re civil authority as well. Tonicthebrown (talk) 09:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome...

Hello, StAnselm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Thanks for this. lol. ;)

Aus.
Controversial? I think it is a biased article so it should have both sides, there is anti-Australian sentiment. And about citations, there are nine (9) citations in the entire written portion of the article, and the first citation does not even then come until the 6th section. Are you advocating propaganda? This should be balanced, I will therefore find the necessary articles for citations, but due to the lack of cited material in the article it's obvious that's not why you deleted it. Slaja (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Jack Chick
Thanks! I'm very new and still getting the hang of things, but thought that's how it went. I would have changed that 'cultures' bit as well. Reads more accurately that way. SiriusBsns (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Harman
A tag has been placed on Allan Harman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ridernyc (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've taken this to AFD. I don't think that someone from PTC who is a scholar should be speedied. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 07:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Indian Theologians
You seem to be avenging some wrongs done to you by other users. Perhaps that is why you are on a deletion spree by citing WP. Does it mean that anyone could add the deletion tag by simply citing WP. Don't you know about the Society for Biblical Studies in India.

You rather seem to be taking the word 'India' a bit too seriously. Does that mean whoever taught theology in India should be deleted. Of course, you will contest this through your reply by citing WP again and again. If you have really been studying Old Testament then better concentrate on it rather than going on a deletion spree. Don't you know that India has a rich heritage and culture and most of the Vatican Two was inspired by Indian Theologians. Don't simply go by Gerhard von Rad or Claus Westermann. What do you know about the Senate of Serampore ? Try to read and know. Do something constructive rather than being destructive.

Try to construct the articles through Value Additions rather than simply adding a deletion tag again by citing WP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grbpradeep (talk • contribs)
 * Hello. You have recently added tags to a multitude of articles claiming "puffery". Can you please explain on the article's talk page why you believe there's an issue, that way others can work with you to remedy the issues rather than continuance of edit warring. Thank you. NJA (t/ c)  15:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

THanks
Thanks for being reasonable and using common sense in your comment regarding page on Nigam Arora.

I am new to Wikepedia and will welcome your help in improving and retaining the first page I created.

John williams 7 (talk) 00:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)John Williams

Macnab
Ah, you beat me to adding the recent billboards to the Francis Macnab article! Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 04:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your message
Thanks for your message. I would like to stick around and learn from people like you, it all depends on if my first page is kept. AS you can tell I have put in a lot of effort. It would have been lot easier if I had run into collegial persons in the beginning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John williams 7 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for the barnstar, it is very much appreciated :). Happy & productive editing to yourself! Best regards, Constantine  ✍  11:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

2010 Melbourne thunderstorm
Apologies, I was intending to go through and fix spelling, etc. I wasn't the one who changed it back. Thanks. Nick carson (talk) 08:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2010 Victorian storms
An article that you have been involved in editing, 2010 Victorian storms, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Thirty pieces of silver
I'm not sure this subject is suitable for a stand-alone article, but could easily be a major section of Judas Iscariot, with your article title redirecting to that section. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * On second thought, you've provided more than enough to show that a stand-alone article is merited. Good work! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

The Grace articles
Hello, St.A. In an effort to give some organization to the multiple articles on grace, I standardized their titles to "Grace (Prevenient)" as you have seen in the template. A user objects and has begun an RM on every "grace" page. The main article said "Christian" but contained two non-Christian divine grace entries which I moved to their respective religious articles on grace. If you have an opinion pro or con, or a third option for the direction of the titles, please indicate that on each articles talk page under the RM section at the bottom.

I'm willing to work further on the main article. I reworked the lead this afternoon, adding reliable sources. I don't understand the complaints "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk  page. Neutrality is disputed. While Kripa  (philosophy) and Non-Theism were in the Christian article, we had major neutrality issues. I moved them to their respective articles. In your opinion, what are the remaining neutrality issues that need attention? Thanks, ─AFA Prof01 (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

The Martyrdom of the seven brothers and their mother
I see that you have removed this entry from the Biblical nameless article page.

The reference comes from the Book of Maccabees 2 Ch7: 1-42. This Book is an essential book of The Bible for a Catholic as defined at the Council of Trent.

If you treat this article page, The Biblical Nameless, from a narrow point of view then there should not be any entry on this page.

The Books that are an essential part of the Catholic Bible are: Tobit, Judith, Esther, Books of Maccabees, The Book of Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, parts of Daniel, & Revelation. These are in addition to The Hebrew Bible.

Hence, I ask you to reverse your deletion.

Are we truly "singing from different song-sheets"?

MacOfJesus (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I have left a follow-up comment on The Biblical Nameless article page.


 * MacOfJesus (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Awesome UN
StAnselm, nice username! "Nor do I seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe that I may understand. For this, too, I believe, that, unless I first believe, I shall not understand."...one of my favorites.--NortyNort (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

The Biblical Nameless
Thank you for the last message on my talk page. I am sorry that we have been unable to go further on this. It is such a narrow field, and all. The Septuagent goes right back to Saint Jerome's first Bible, in Latin. We owe so much to our fore-fathers who handed on this treasure to us we call faith. We need to guard it too, as Saint Athanasius who was so fearless to hand on the faith intact; ("Arius" by Rowan Williams). Sorry, it was Saint Augustine who was baptised by Saint Ambrose of Milan. Where does life go on without agreement? I have referred you to Rowan Williams book "Arius", Arius wanted a faith that was not dependant on Mystery and could be reasonable and understandable. I studied this afresh for my writing on the article pages Saint Athanasius and Saint Augustine.

Einstine, referred to mystery as somethig that we cannot work out and maybe never be able to work out, but we can see clearly in it's end result.

MacOfJesus (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Tamar
Thanks and well done for sorting out the biblical Tamars! I keep an eye on the rivers, so it's good to see someone take them on. DuncanHill (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Assistance Requested
You seem to be a very knowledgeable and reputable wikipedian. Single purpose user TruTelr (talk) keeps vandalizing the Barry McCarty page by removing information cited by third party sources. Specifically, he states that all of the references naming Barry McCarty as Harriet Miers's minister in 2005 are incorrect. This fact is significant as it brought McCarty significant national media coverage during Miers's nomination to the Supreme Court. I bring this to you since you've previously commented on the page.

I've asked TruTelr (talk) multiple times to bring the discussion to the talk page instead of erasing the information. He refuses and has now vandalized the page 6 times. Is there anything you can do to help sort this out? Thanks. Alan1701 (talk) 11:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Great job sorting out the mess on that page; it's greatly appreciated! Alan1701 (talk) 07:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

inferno, the unit
Sir, Inferno is not a made-up unit. It is a unit in Astrophysics. It is equal to 1 billion kelvin (appx. = 1 billion degree celcius) Here's the link for the info  பரிதிமதி (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Political families of Australia
I notice you've cleaned this page up a bit - great work! -- Chuq (talk) 22:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Christian soldier
Do not vandalize an article that is under a deletion +tag. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WritersCramp (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Cricket Club AfDs
Hi there. I have commented on four of your Cricket Club AfDs (three deletes and a keep). Thank you for bringing these matters to AfD for community discussion. However, in future, if you're intending to invoke WP:CRIN please keep in mind it's project-local and is not a guideline or policy endorsed by the Wikipedia community. The appropriate way to phrase these would be to say, "I believe this club is non-notable per WP:N. Those unfamiliar with cricket may be assisted by WikiProject Cricket's view on similar matters, which can be found at WP:CRIN." Hope that helps you to raise more successful AfDs in future! - DustFormsWords (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Lamech (father of Noah)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lamech (father of Noah), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060916223601AA5x9qL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lamech (father of Noah)
A tag has been placed on Lamech (father of Noah) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome!
Thanks for the welcome! I'm editing the page for Dardanus with citations of the Bible and a book by E. Raymond Capt, would that be okay? I know how biased the Bible is, so I was not sure. :\

CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

My bad!
Thanks for the welcome for real now. Ahahaha. Sorry I forgot to sign my post. :) CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Will Do
Just published now. Thanks for the help. :)

CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Liberation of Saint Peter
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beowulf: The Legend


The article Beowulf: The Legend has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jminthorne (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Artabanus V of Parthia
Hello StAnselm, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Artabanus V of Parthia has been removed. It was removed by 70.29.208.247 with the following edit summary ' (rm PROD - seems to be a copy-and-paste move from 2005 involved here to the other article...) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with 70.29.208.247 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll restore it to the redirect to the general Artabanus page, which can explain the numbering. Gdr 18:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Session of Christ
Hi! I have reviewed your Did You Know? nomination of Session of Christ, and identified what I believe to be a string of serious problems with the article making it ineligible for DYK. In my opinion it would take a substantial rewrite of the article to address these problems such that it is unlikely to be ready prior to Ascension Day. However, if you end up making changes and would like me to revisit the nomination please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. A full explanation of my concerns can be found at the nomination discussion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Session of Christ
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for John's vision of the Son of Man
Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)