User talk:St quadri

Talk: Rabit Search (A Complete Business Encyclopedia)

( (talk) 17:32, July 2014 (UTC)) need help regarding the multiple issues as pointed out by Adm.


 * I've covered off the "no links" issue for you; what you were doing was linking to other Wikipedia articles by inserting the full web URLs of those pages, as if they were a different website entirely, instead of by putting square brackets around the linked words to create internal links. As for the referencing tag, the basic issue is that most of them are primary sources (e.g. the Google Books pages for his books themselves), whereas what we generally need here is third party sources (e.g. media coverage, books by other people, etc., where somebody other than him is writing about him). I can't directly fix the references for you, because I'm not terribly familiar with Indian media and don't know where to track down stronger sources — but that's the basic issue there. Bearcat (talk) 17:32, July 2014 (UTC)

Edgar181 (talk) 11:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC) --Shirt58 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Voceditenore (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Tiderolls (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: I have restored the block notice. St quadri, you may not remove a block notice as long as the block is in effect. Voceditenore (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sahil


 * St quadri, please do not attempt to place a notice on your talk page saying that your request for unblocking has been accepted by an administrator, when it clearly hasn't, as you did with this edit. If you wish to request unblocking place   below the last block message. Note also, that your deleted article was not only blatant advertising which is not permitted here, it was also a copyright infringement which is not permitted here. You had copied it verbatim from this web page which is clearly marked: Copyright © 2013 rabitsearch.com. Voceditenore (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Respected sir/madam I want to unblock my article it’s title name Rabit Search (A Complete Business Encyclopedia) it’s based on b2b and b2c business, e-commerce, business activity which is usefully for internet researcher and those who are interested in business activities and it is useful for business men they create own business website. Kindly unblock my article, thanking you Category:Wikinews help Alernatvely in fact preferably Category:Wikinews help and Category:Wikinews pages available with translation tool kit at meta or translate wiki  along with usefull templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.224.189 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 26 July 2014‎
 * Your account is blocked because you are using it only for advertising or promotion, and that is not allowed on Wikipedia. You may make another unblock request, but you need to read the reply to your last request, and the WP:Guide to appealing blocks and explain what sort of edits you want to make. If all you want to do is promote Rabit Search, you will not be unblocked. JohnCD (talk) 12:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: I moved this down because new contributions should go at the bottom of talk pages, so that order of the conversation is clear. JohnCD (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I have reverted your most recent edits to this talk page because you simply copy-pasted some random code from elsewhere and asked for help without asking a question. If you want to request unblocking, follow the advice given in the block message. If you have a specific question, please ask. Huon (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

You seem to be having some real problems with using Wikipedia.
You have placed another "Help me notice" on your page without asking a question or saying what you want help for, and then you added the signature of JohnCD beneath it. And why have you pasted beneath it an invitation to the Teahouse addressed to completely different user? If you have a question, please write it underneath the "Help me" notice and sign your own name, not someone else's. Voceditenore (talk) 17:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that while I was writing the above, Huon also gave you some further advice about the same thing. If you are having trouble learning how to use your talk page properly and to sign your messages, WP:TALK has guidance, especially this section. Voceditenore (talk) 17:57, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * ...and please place any new "helpme" or unblock request at the bottom of this page, not in the middle. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * When you make a request for unblocking, don't copy an already declined request. Use the template from the big sandy coloured box to make a fresh request. Use the 'spamun' one. But you will not be unblocked until we are certain that you understand. Whatever course you are doing, you are NOT allowed to break the rules of Wikipedia. If your tutor is telling you to post material such as you have been doing, then show him/her this message. They may not understand Wikipedia properly, or you may not understand it. Believe me, WE do understand it, and what we are telling you is correct. Advertising and things that even look like advertising are not allowed, and people who ignore warnings and go on doing things wrong get blocked. This isn't punishment. We are protecting the encyclopaedia (and saving work for the people who have to put things right). Peridon (talk) 09:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

You will not be unblocked to create "Rabit Search (A Complete Business Encyclopedia)"
Hello St quadri.

You cannot create "Rabit Search" or "Rabit Search (A Complete Business Encyclopedia)" on Wikipedia.

This is because:
 * it does not pass the test of "notability" for companies, and
 * Wikipedia is not a website to advertise your company.

You are wasting your time trying to get it created again.

If you write that that you want to be unblocked so that you can create "Rabit Search" or "Rabit Search (A Complete Business Encyclopedia)" again, then I will stop you from making any changes to this "talk page".

Peter in Australia --Shirt58 (talk) 11:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


 * St Quadri, please pay attention. The article was not only blatant advertising, it was a copyright violation. You had copied it verbatim from this web page which is clearly marked: Copyright © 2013 rabitsearch.com. You may not place copyrighted text on Wikipedia and you may not create articles which are blatant advertising. If you are ever unblocked and attempt to do either of those things again, you will be permanently blocked. Voceditenore (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


 * User is basically asking to be unblocked to create the article again: "and add the same thing which is the website of rabitsearch.com". No point wasting any further time.  Talk page access revoked.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)