User talk:Staberinde/Archive 3

Ship camouflage
Thanks for the German image which does help to balance the Allied emphasis in the article. What is really needed now is a good reference or two to German and other Axis ship camouflage sources. If you know of any, that would be extremely helpful. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Nah sorry, don't have any, my knowledge about this topic is limited to what I have seen on photos :) --Staberinde (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * OK, but you never know, you may come across a museum booklet or something one day. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for EUFOR RCA
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Deportations of the Ingrian Finns
Hello! Your submission of Deportations of the Ingrian Finns at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Deportations of the Ingrian Finns
Gatoclass (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Huh?
Re this edit. Why the dab? The link was pointing to the right article. Am I missing something? Renata (talk) 19:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * How it can be pointing to right article then paragraph talks about crusade against Sambians in 1254/55, while Battle of Rudau is about battle in 1370?--Staberinde (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Ants Kurvits
Sounds like Latvian 'Kurvītis'? --Zemgalietis (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * No idea :) Maybe Latvian language version could be found from some list of Order of Lāčplēsis recipients, but other than that I can't offer any good advice on this.--Staberinde (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Sia (musician)
I invite you to an ongoing move request; you were involved in one of previous discussions. --George Ho (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military of Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Eleven Days War
Hallo, I was looking for candidates for List of wars named for their duration and saw this dab page, but I can't find any mention of "Eleven days war" in Operation Linebacker II. If you've got a source for that name, please add it to the article. Otherwise the dab page needs to be deleted as there's no justification for that entry on it. The dab page should only have one blue link per entry anyway - I'll do a quick tidy up. Thanks. Pam D  17:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, if I do quick google or google books search for "eleven day war" you should get lots of Linebacker II results. I will throw something to that page.--Staberinde (talk) 12:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Estonian Free Party
Hello! Your submission of Estonian Free Party at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Alex2006 (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Estonian Free Party
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 18:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Jean Baptiste Holzmayer
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dzungar genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dzungar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikicology arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 22, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wikicology/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The message was sent using the case's MassMessage list. Unless you are a party, you may remove your name from the list to stop receiving notifications regarding the case.

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. ''This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page.'' For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I think you meant ; please revert if I'm mistaken. NE Ent 16:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what I meant, thanks.--Staberinde (talk) 16:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Hello, I'm CWH. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ch (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have actual arguments about my edit, then please present them. Otherwise, frankly I can do without patronizing vandalism templates.--Staberinde (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others closed
An arbitration case regarding Gamaliel and others has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Gamaliel is admonished for multiple breaches of Wikipedia policies and guidelines including for disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, removing a speedy deletion notice from a page he created, casting aspersions, and perpetuating what other editors believed to be a BLP violation.
 * 2) DHeyward and Gamaliel are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with or discussing each other anywhere on Wikipedia, subject to the usual exemptions.
 * 3) is admonished for engaging in incivility and personal attacks on other editors. He is reminded that all editors are expected to engage respectfully and civilly with each other and to avoid making personal attacks.
 * 4) For conduct which was below the standard expected of an administrator — namely making an incivil and inflammatory close summary on ANI, in which he perpetuated the perceived BLP violation and failed to adequately summarise the discussion — JzG is admonished.
 * 5) Arkon is reminded that edit warring, even if exempt, is rarely an alternative to discussing the dispute with involved editors, as suggested at WP:CLOSECHALLENGE.
 * 6) The community is encouraged to hold an RfC to supplement the existing WP:BLPTALK policy by developing further guidance on managing disputes about material involving living persons when that material appears outside of article space and is not directly related to article-content decisions.
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Estonia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SvenEst (talk • contribs) 23:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Just a notice about Estonia
Hi,

I saw that there's an edit war going on at Estonia's article. Just wanted to let you know that JonSonberg (when the report was opened his username was JaanMatti and it got changed while waiting for a decision) was already blocked for edit-warring not long ago. Should he be reported again? Because it's clear that he learned nothing from his last ban. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Just want to let you know that I took his abusive editing to WP:AN3. If you want, please give your input there. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up!
Dear Staberinde,

Thanks for the warning! Although, you could improve your grammar. Alright, I'll cease operations (albeit reluctantly) against the others (even though I'm right about the infobox issue/controversy).

Timeline
Hi, would be great to get your opinion on this thread:

[|Historic Timeline Table]

SørenKierkegaard (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nordic countries
Hi, respectfully asking for your opinion in the "Estonia" section of the Nordic countries talk page. SørenKierkegaard (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waders ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Estonia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Estonia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ülo Nugis
Hello! Your submission of Ülo Nugis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  JGHowes   talk  22:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Ülo Nugis
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Oeselians & Norsemen
Hi! You seem to know a lot about the Estonian history. There is an open discussion on the pages: Oeselians and Norsemen. There are editors claiming Oeselians were not Finnic or not speaking a Finnic language, and other editors claiming they were Finnic. On the Norsemen page, there are some editors claiming there was a Norse settlement on Saaremaa, while other editors are saying there's no proof for that. Would be grateful for your input! Thanks! Blomsterhagens (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)