User talk:StaceyKMcMillan

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 15:49, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Nomination of Caitlin Galway for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caitlin Galway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caitlin Galway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:25, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Canadian authors
Stacey, I note from your contributions that you appear to have undertake a project to expand the coverage of Canadian authors at Wikipedia. A commendable project, but please keep Wikipedia's notability guidelines in mind. Your latest contribution, David Stouck, does not appear to merit inclusion. The creation of a large body of work is not, in itself, notable. The creation of a body of work that has been recognized as significant in some manner would make one notable, but this does not appear to be the case with Mr Stouck. Short listed or finalist (not even a winner) for several relatively minor local book awards does not quite meet the bar. I have noted the notability problem on the article. If it can be addressed, great; if not, the article will likely be deleted. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I do feel that Stacey has added enough WP:RS to establish notability. Were this to be nominated for deletion in its current form, my view would be to oppose. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed -- there are sufficient sources now. There were not when I made my comments.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Uh, yes, please read WP:BIO. I just looked at three biographies of yours, and had to AFD all three of them. I don't have time to review all of your contribs, but I am seriously worried about them, given the current three out of three sample I looked at :( CC User:WikiDan61, User:Shawn in Montreal). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Defaultsort
Hi, when you create these articles you may wish to start adding a "default sort" template, just over the categories, to ensure that your article subject is categorized by last rather than first name. I've just added it to Aga Maksimowska and what it looks like is. You can find the template in the "Wiki mark up" list under your edit screen, or type it out manually, or just copy it from my comment here, substituting the name as need be. best and happy editing, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Aga Maksimowska for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aga Maksimowska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aga Maksimowska until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of David Stouck for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Stouck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Stouck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Adria Vasil for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adria Vasil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adria Vasil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Melanie Murray


The article Melanie Murray has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:AUTHOR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Melanie Murray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melanie Murray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Melanie Murray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. GraziePrego (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)