User talk:Stack:prism

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to India–Nepal relations has been undone.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India–Nepal relations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Bladesmulti (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean it is unconstructive? If the China-Nepal relations article has a section about human trafficking, then why shouldn't India, the biggest human trafficking country in the world and its chief victim, Nepal have a section? It is one of the greatest detriments of the open border policy, and very little is being done by India, which has sole jurisdiction over the brothels. Stack:prism (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2014 (EST)
 * It has no influence on the relations of nepal-india. Because it is done between the people, not between the government. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Indian government, which has the power to close these brothels,police the border,repatriate these enslaved women, has done virtually nothing to curb this humanitarian crisis. India's disregard shows great callousness towards Nepal. If you really believe that the governments have no responsibility in what goes on within their borders, even if it is greatly hurting another country's sovereignty then, why don't you remove the section about human trafficking in China-Nepal relations first, since compared to India, trafficking between China and Nepal is virtually nonexistent. It doesn't change India's situation but I would like to test your impartiality. Stack:prism (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2014 (EST)
 * You should request on China-Nepal relations instead, for the removal of such sections. I am not concerned. Right now, all you can do is revert your edit back, as it's not going to be accepted either way. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll take my chances.Stack:prism (talk) 04:51, 20 January 2014 (EST)
 * I have removed both from Nepal-China, and India-China now. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)