User talk:Stadium

July 2008
Welcome to wikipedia. Some of your edits appear to be advertising. Wikipedia is not an opportunity for free advertising so please avoid further similar edits. Thank you. Nev1 (talk) 09:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Palais_omnisports_de_Paris-Bercy&oldid=227360040. Don't. --86.150.224.148 (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * As of August 4, 2008, there were at least 50 advertisements for the Tina Turner tour alone. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 05:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You have made further edits to the Manchester Evening News Arena article that could be construed as advertisement. I shall reiterate my previous warning and remind you that such edits are unacceptable. Nev1 (talk) 02:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I sincerely hope that you work for Tina Turner or are her agent or something, because if not then you like her a little bit too much...borderline stalker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.204.224 (talk) 07:47, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Dancefloor royalty (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an adequate edit summary. I note that although you leave an edit summary for each edit you make, you always say "to fix". Please note this in no way conveys what changes you have made. The purpose of the summary is to convey to other editors what changes you made, not just that you made them. Also, please note that additions of facts, such as awards, etc., must have independent sourcing. Never add additional facts to an article between a sentence and the reference that follows it. This implies the addition also came from that source, and leaves the actual sentence unsourced. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Alkclark (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please stop returning the paragraph of excessive puffery to the lead of the Tina Turner article. This was removed in an effort to make the article more neutral and lessen the amount of peacockery in the article. This material is excessive in its promotional tone and other editors have agreed that it needs to come out. You are going against consensus of other editors when you return it, and I assure you, it will be removed each time you try to re-insert it. If you cannot accept the consensus of other editors, then perhaps you should stop editing the article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Tina Turner
This article has been designated a good article. When an article reaches that point, it is considered appropriate to approach the article talk page and broach major changes or additions so that other editors may comment and/or object prior to its addition. Since you seem to qualify as a single purpose account, mostly concerned with only articles concerning Turner, it would also mean that you are even more so obligated to discuss changes before they are made. The extensive section you added tonight to the article is better used as individual additions to the already linked articles on the various concert tours Turner has been on. The main article on Turner does not need detailed puffery on the details of these tours, and it never is appropriate to add a complete section with no supporting citations. When an article meets good article status, it mainly means it is reaching completion and doesn't need major expansion like this. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)