User talk:Staff3

Your request in regard to Biocentrism page
On my talk page, you wrote: Dear Sinneed, You were invaluable to creating the new "Biocentrism" page. You did an incredible job, as reflected in the expoential increase in number of people who have since used the resource (over 2,000 people on some days). Unfortunately, somebody changed the main biocentrism page. Does one individual have the authority to make this decision? Over 90% of material and entries on Google and other major search engines refer to biocentrism in the scientific/cosmological sense of the word. And the audience profile of the "Biocentrism" page (for Wikipedia as a public resource) tracks precisely to articles that appear periodically about biocentrism (the scientific theory). The decision to change this shouldn;t depend on one person's bias and/or prejudices (or whether they personally like the idea or not).Do you know how this can be corrected? Any help would be appreciated. - Staff3 (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Because of what I see as the tendentious nature of many of the edits on Lanza-related articles, I had dropped this from my watch list. I have resumed watching the main Biocentrism article, and made a comment supporting the change tentatively.  It seems appropriate, as I see it.
 * It is appropriate for an editor to move forward wp:BOLDly in an effort to improve the encyclopedia. wp:BRD might be worth a read, but I must observe that I think you will find only narrow support for reverting this change.  At this time I support the change, though I will be "listening to" the discussion.
 * While any proposed or opposed change should be discussed at the article talk page, please feel free to respond here (or on my talk page if you prefer, you are always welcome there) if you have questions or concerns that are not specifically article-related. - Sinneed  20:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Regener. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)