User talk:StairySky

People of Northern Ireland
My rationale was that the British people template links to this page, but seeing how the other groups listed related to Northern Ireland doesn't have that the template, I'm going to drop this. Saturdayopen (talk) 18:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Hayes (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Your recent editing history at Warrington bombings shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GimliDotNet (talk) 10:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 01:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Sheehy Skeffington
Hello StairySky. Regarding the court martial section of the Sheehy Skeffington article, just wondering why you deleted the mention of the leading question in the end note? I would have thought the question was an important component of defence counsel's strategy to portray Bowen-Colthurst as insane, and it also accounts for the uniformity of testimony on Bowen-Colthurst's demeanour at the time of the shootings. The question was only permissible in cross-examination and perhaps signalled a de facto change of plea from 'Not guilty ' to 'Insane'.```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanK9 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It was WP:OR StairySky (talk) 06:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John MacHale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High mass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)