User talk:StanShardlow

Good you've joined, perhaps now we can talk about why you continue to edit the link? You say yours was edited first? So, what happened? Alan, its very unreasonable and extremely disapointing to be going through this AGAIN. What is your problem?

Adam

I've already responded to the old IP address Discussion but here it is again, and no need to shout:

I have just registered so that you cannot use the "nameless" ploy. I had no user name before because I did not feel the need for one. After all, you couldn't get me banned if you didn't know who I am!

No the issue is 2-fold: 1) Yesterday, and not many days ago as you state (see log), in all innocence, I amended our link and put the links in Battalion order, quite logical, without actually touching your 3/95th info! Your reasoning of being first because your link was there before others is, I would suggest, political and has nothing to do with good practice since there is none stated in Wikipedia guidelines. Alphabetic order would be far more user friendly.

2) In retaliation, you changed the link address for 1/95th on these Wikipedia pages. This practice impacts people's ability to visit our site, ie infringement of our data, a far worse crime than putting a link one place above another. That really builds bridges!

For information, it is not good practice to threaten people; Wikipedia states "Don't threaten people: For example, threatening people with "admins you know" or having them banned for disagreeing with you."

To put an end to this farce and because it seems so vital to you to be above the 1/95 and 2/95 in the External Links list, I will not move our links again.

That's an end to it. Alan



Alan,

Firstly, thank you for ending it, very decent of you.

In an attempt to continue to build bridges what would you say to us exchangeing web links on our own sites, to eachother? Purely as a gesture of good will! I hope to assure you Alan that I have no problem with your regiment at all and see no point in dragging on a feud that is utterly pointless.

I'll leave it up to you, but I think it would be another small step in the right direction. Though we're not recognised under any battalion number outside the NA, your welcome to address us as 3/95th if you wish.

What do you reckon?

Ad :0)

External link policy violation
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 23:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)