User talk:Stan pulsus

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Please STOP
Please do NOT move articles by creating new ones and then copy/paste the old one. This is against the license under which WP operates. MOVES have to be done using the MOVE function (one of the tabs on top of a page), because this will preserve an article's edit history. I will ask an admin to delete the new articles you have created, so that the move can correctly be done. Thanks. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello Stan pulsus. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pulsus Group, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Experimental & Clinical Cardiology
Regarding this edit: I guess you're pissed that they have left your publisher. However, that is not a reason simply to remove all links instead of correctly updating the article. Please refrain from such vandalism-like edits in future. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC) I apologize for simply removing the links. According to the Cardiology Academic Press website, it is no longer being published by the same group. I had left the publisher blank because it had not been stated who the new publishing group is.