User talk:Stanbidder1

Welcome!
Hello, Stanbidder1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Murry1975 (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Please to help your invovlement and input to the project read WP:ISNOT, it details what Wiki is not used for. Thanks.Murry1975 (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Murry1975 (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Limerick City Council. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Murry1975 (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Limerick, you may be blocked from editing. Murry1975 (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Limerick City Council, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Murry1975 (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Help Me
murry1975 why are you deleting my edits? are you employee of wikipedia? i was only stating facts that are correct. can you please put my edits back up please as they are correct. thanks
 * I am trying to help you by giving you the information you need. The facts you state need to be sourced and cited, not what you know Limerick, and the council is like. These and other helpful guidelines can be found above.Murry1975 (talk) 17:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * are you a another wikipedia user or are you employee? how do you spot edits that you believe to be vandalisim so quickly? its not fair that you dont allow free speech.
 * User, wikipedia is a community based organisation very few employees. How did I spot the edits? I have a watchlist that show new edits on, then I read the edits, what vandalism is "any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia". Free speech? Well its an encyclopaedia not a soapbox. You are welcome to make edits and contribute, I hope you do but please understand any material that doesnt belong in an encyclopaedia will be removed.Murry1975 (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ok murry1975 i am sorry if it was considered vandalisim, i was try to imform other users what to know about the subject in question, but i understand now what you mean, just one last question out of curiosity? how do you or any other member have to power to block me? if i did not like another edidors post can i block them and how is it done? i will no longer be editing here so dont worry about that,i dont want to be blocked, thanks
 * I like that you listen to advice. I understand what you were trying to do but facts have to be back up with a citation, I know that you feel pasionate about your area and let down by those in charge, like many people in Ireland. Its not that I oppose your views but wiki is meant to be written from a neutral view WP:NPOV. Please edit and input into the project that is what it is here for but just follow the guidelines. And to answer your question its not about posts we like or dont, there are plenty on here I dont like, its about the validity of the entry, example changing Jim Long into something slightly rude, or writing something that is from a view point that isnt backed with a source. Certain editors are known as admins (yes you guessed it short for administrators), these have a range of powers from blocking to being able to check other things to do with the running of the project, and no I am not one and niether are yo ;). Blocking is harsh and admins dont like doing it, thats why there are systems and guidelines in place, like the 4 level warning above, this gives editors a chance to see where they have stepped out-side the guidelines and stop in time, like you have today. Others have not, you would suprised how many. Some I have seen blocked indefinitly after just two edits, it all depends on what you edit where, a biography of a living person being edited in a vulgar and disruptive way usually gets a spanking alright.  You seem a reasonable person, join in the project promote the good things about Limerick, add cited material to the articles, big it up, show people the good side. Or even help with things like GAA or Munster rugby, they are on here and need editors to help. I signed up last May, I stuck around reading why things happen and how they get done on here, I didnt make my first edit until September and I still find it a confusing place at times, but please stick around and have a good effect on the project, please dont let one day be your only experience of here. Hope to interact with you in the future.Murry1975 (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 19:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * toddst1 iwas stating a fact,why was it deleted, there are many unsourced edits on here and they are not deleted, why? ((unsigned|Stanbidder1}}
 * toddst1 why did you block me? ((unsigned|Stanbidder1}}


 * Stanbidder1, I'm declining this block for a couple of reasons. First, because you say you made the edits in part to see if you would be blocked or not.  Doing something you've been told is wrong again, to see what will happen, is disruptive, and means other people have to take their time to clean up after you.  Second, you said you were going to stop, and then an hour later, you did it again.  Dishonesty is discouraged.  Third, you really need all 48 hours to read some of the links in your welcome message.  You cannot just insert your opinion into any article you wish, and re-insert it if someone removes it.  If you wish to participate here, you need to see how Wikipedia works by reading the links in the welcome message. Lastly, to answer your question, only an administrator can block an editor, so no, you can't block someone you disagree with. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I have now reblocked you indefinitely, because you're playing games by creating User:Mikelimerick to continue this silliness. If you wish to be unblocked, you're going to need to convince an admin that you aren't going to do this anymore. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stanbidder1/Archive
 * Here is the evidence, a checkuser was also requested and this identified the three accounts as matches.
 * WP:R Van "If you see that a user has added vandalism you may also check the user's other contributions (click "User contributions" on the left sidebar of the screen)."
 * Not stalking but just helping the project. Murry1975 (talk) 12:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Like several things your page is on my watchlist, I have many different type articles on it, you and your two other accounts, Mikelimerick and Declan799 should up on these list while vandalising certain articles. The checkuser has confirmed a match on these accounts so there is no denying this, as you just have. Nobody likes a snitch? On wiki nobody likes a vandal. You should read the links above that were given to you to help you. Murry1975 (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, kindly stop accusing Murry1975 of stalking your edits and of being in the employ of the organizations whose articles you have edited. As previously explained to you, Murry1975 simply noticed your inappropriate edits, reverted them, and checked your other edits for appropriateness. If you continue, your ability to edit this page will be revoked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:44, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I have given a link to the case above. DORD hasnt removed your talkpage access yet, but any admin reading this might if you cant go by the guidelines. At this stage I dont think you are willing to work within the project, thats my personal view. But I am going to spell it out for you in good faith.
 * Your edits and mikelimericks edits were a similar style of vandalism, 1+1=2.
 * Declan799 - snap.
 * Reported and requested a checkuser here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stanbidder1/Archive
 * You have continually been guided to read the rules and guidelines most blue links above. I am not going to type them out individually  but the gist is: be nice, dont point and stare, dont add your opinion, dont call names, and read the rules.
 * Now if you have any questions after reading all the blue links please feel free to ask. Murry1975 (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is a project to give the world a free on-line sourced factual encyclopaedia. We all work towards that. I have a watchlist of articles, all regulars do. If something crops up we react. What drew my attention, he was a vandal. Murry1975 (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

It is quite apparent to me that this is never going to end. Talk page access has been removed. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)