User talk:Stand Dealt

Croton Gorge Park
I have added a "" template to the article Croton Gorge Park, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 24fan24 (talk) 02:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The prod was contested and removed by another user. I have since nominated it for deletion through the articles for deletion process. Please share your thoughts on this article's deletion debate. --24fan24 (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Stand Dealt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. 24fan24 (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)