User talk:Standish7

September 11, 2001 attacks
WTC 7 - If someone can scientifically explain how it collapsed, and not politically, please do so. Brain washing can only occur is people do not think objectively.

And now a message from the empire.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Vslashg (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOR..we don't permit original research in article space. Thank you.--MONGO 08:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

I'd have to say that www.911truth.org is nothing but brainwashing nonsense. Please also see WP:3RR about our three revert rule as you have tried to put the same information in the September 11, 2001 attacks three times now and a fourth attempt will violate our policies.--MONGO 08:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

FYI
FYI, I have reverted your edit. See Zionism and racism. Encyclopedias should explain and expose slander, and not spread it. ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Ask a Palestinian if they believe Zionism is Racism. Or ask Rachel Corrie, sorry you cant she is dead.

Speedy deletion of Cyborg soldier
A tag has been placed on Cyborg soldier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. gnfnrf (talk) 13:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Cincinnati wolfhounds
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cincinnati wolfhounds, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wolfhoundsrfc.com/info.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Le goldman
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Le goldman, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 21:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Michelle Jenneke
Hi, and thanks for your contribution of the article Michelle Jenneke. I have placed a tag after a certain claim in the article, indicating that a reference should be inserted after the claim in question for verification. Please return to the article and make any appropriate changes. Thanks! --IShadowed 17:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Michelle Jenneke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Jenneke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michelle Jenneke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Sandstein  12:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)