User talk:Standrewswc

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of what username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Hi, I deleted your recent article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * You say virtually nothing about the course other than that it has 36 holes, the rest is its history
 * It was written in a somewhat promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, but this concentrated on listing achievements rather than facts.
 * The article was created in one edit without wikilinks or functioning external links. It looks as if it was cut and pasted from an unknown, possibly copyright source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by your organisation, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage of the centre in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * The article title was, incidentally, not correctly capitalised, and there is no apostrophe in "pros"

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  20:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)