User talk:Stanford2000

Speedy deletion nomination of John B. Taschner
Hello Stanford2000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John B. Taschner for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blackguard 07:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John B. Taschner


The article John B. Taschner has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No independent, reliable sources *about* him. Non-notable student.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of John B. Taschner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John B. Taschner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John B. Taschner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John B. Taschner because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ascetic Rosé   15:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)