User talk:Staninats

Barack Obama presidential eligibility litigation
Hi. Your recent set of edits to the article on Barack Obama presidential eligibility litigation had to be reverted (undone) because Wikipedia articles may not contain original research. You would need to cite a reliable source and report a legal analysis of this sort based on what reliable sources have said about the situation. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi again. After I [ reverted your earlier addition] of unsourced, original legal analysis, you [ added more material] of this same sort.  As I indicated earlier, this is not acceptable on Wikipedia; see the No Original Research policy, as well as the Reliable Sources policy.  If you continue doing this, you risk being blocked from editing in order to protect Wikipedia from damage.  I would strongly advise you to undo your latest batch of edits; if you do not do so, I or someone else will.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Barack Obama presidential eligibility litigation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not use original research or synthesis when adding conspiracy theories about living persons  Dave Dial (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)