User talk:Stanislawskachko

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Oqwert (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Thank you. @Oqwert
 * Will read policies and guidelines, and try to adapt Unbiased Scribe (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Mellk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of Russian monarchs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 20:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear @Mellk @Teahouse
 * Kindly ask you to study history and revert back my changes which are historically correct.
 * There is no such thing as "Russian monarchs" - it is just long-term propaganda of Peter I.
 * The initial state was Rus' (with Kyiv as capital). So Tsars of Rus
 * Then there have been Tsardom of Moscovia - so Tsars of Moscovia
 * Thena there have been Rosiia Empire - so ‎Emperors of Rosija
 * https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/4e38887e7c05d/
 * https://universum.lviv.ua/journal/2011/6/dashk.htm
 * https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/ukrayina-rus-i-moskoviya/31521000.html
 * https://www.quora.com/When-was-Moscovia-renamed-to-Russia
 * https://www.swaen.com/listing/moscovia-or-russia/23222 stanislawskachko (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * These are not the titles on English Wikipedia. "Rosija" is not even English. Mellk (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The whole page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_monarchs is just a biased Kremlin propaganda
 * Rus' is not Moscovia. Russia is not Rus'.
 * Princes of Novgorod - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Novgorod semi-legendary Varangian chieftains"
 * Grand Prince of Kyiv - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Rus' monarchs"
 * Feudal period - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Rus' monarchs"
 * Grand Duchy of Vladimir - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Rus' monarchs"
 * Grand Princes of Moscow - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Moscow monarchs"
 * Tsars of Russia - Those are not "Russian monarch" but "Moscow Tsars"
 * Time of Troubles - Those are not "Russian monarch" but clearly "Moscow Tsars"
 * Emperors of Russia - here is interesting fact. even Peter І renamed empire still in many Western sources this country was named as Moscovian Empire till approx 1700 Unbiased Scribe (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Mellk (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please note that as you are not extended confirmed, you are unable to make edits about Russia–Ukraine war due to WP:RUSUKR, broadly construed. Mellk (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear @Mellk how is it possible to be a extended confirmed ? stanislawskachko (talk) 12:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kievan Rus', you may be blocked from editing. Mellk (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear @Mellk
 * as per Encyclopedia Britannica proper spelling is Kyiv?
 * https://www.britannica.com/place/Kyiv/History stanislawskachko (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Free Nations of Post-Russia Forum, you may be blocked from editing.  // Timothy :: talk  14:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear @TimothyBlue
 * Most of the sources have been mentioned
 * Sources of FNPR.png
 * so deletion of all content violates of
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Talking_and_editing
 * If some information specifically to your mind violates "poorly sourced content" - kindly ask to proofread and verify, otherwise it lloks ike a vandalizm from your side stanislawskachko (talk) 16:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If some information specifically to your mind violates "poorly sourced content" - kindly ask to proofread and verify, otherwise it lloks ike a vandalizm from your side stanislawskachko (talk) 16:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  // Timothy :: talk  15:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Kindly ask to unblock me stanislawskachko (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't think we can unblock you to edit about Eastern Europe topics, especially as you have a WP:conflict of interest. Please describe what constructive edits you would make out side of this topic area.--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear @Deepfriedokra
 * Big thanks that you replied because it is already almost a month since I've been blocked.
 * I can write/edit on multiple topics since I have a very wide professional interests based on my education, travels in US/Canada/EU/Asia/Africa/Latin America and very wide community of friends from countries around the globe. Some topics may include: Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Energy, Cars, IT, History, Personalities, Geography, Global and Regional politics.
 * Big thanks for providing link for WP:conflict of interest - read that very carefully. As open-minded person I will double check to be objective an unbiased. Thanks Unbiased Scribe (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * What will you do instead of harassment, WP:INCIVILITY or WP:edit warring when in a Wp:content dispute? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I certainly will do my best to find a consensus based on facts, possibly involve other people to take unbiased judgment. Can use talk page discussions, focus on content, request other editors' help for content disputes. And believe that Wiki can be a collaborative effort of free-mided people Unbiased Scribe (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * big thanks for links WP:edit warring and Wp:content dispute
 * great advices to focus on articles where constructive edits can be made in calm and constructive manner
 * Thanks Unbiased Scribe (talk) 15:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the user who in their unblock request calls Russia "Moscovia" should have an indefinite ban on anything related to Russia and Ukraine. For the rest, I would be fine with an unblock. They are under scrutiny, and it would be not difficult to reblock if they misbehave. Ymblanter (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear @Ymblanter historically names of any space, country, nation can be subject of deep research. "Name Russia/Moscovia matter" can be discussed possibly in this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscovia_(region)
 * But as I know - modern widely known names of countries for now are Russia and Ukraine, so those can be certainly used. Once again - lets be polite, collaborative and open-minded. Thanks Unbiased Scribe (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Q. E. D. I think you just showed the need for the topic ban. I'll circle back -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, those are not the only resources available for WP:CONTENTDISPUTE's -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If anyone else wants this, Ima ramble on -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Deepfriedokra I certainly believe that Wiki as encyclopedia should be written from a neutral point of view, with free content. And any editor who treat each others with respect and civility can use, edit, and distribute knowledge. Including research, discussions and finding consensus based on facts. Regards Unbiased Scribe (talk) 11:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that while that sounds high-minded, it does not answer the question. thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for providing WP:CONTENTDISPUTE WP:conflict of interest WP:INCIVILITY WP:edit warring. As well I've read WP:5P and clearly do not see any valid reason why should I still be blocked from editing any of the page. As I recognized initial mistake, explained  intention to provide NPOV and valuable contribution to wiki in various areas and agreed to follow good practices of editing and interacting with other editors. So can you help, which questions do you exactly mean? Unbiased Scribe (talk) 13:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No. I'm afraid this shows you just don't know what to do. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that such answers are deeply demoralizing. I believe that as per WP:ADMINCOND admins should have a good faith and help users? Unbiased Scribe (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ymblanter ? Unbiased Scribe (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * And kindly
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers Unbiased Scribe (talk) 11:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * What demoralizes me is seeing two unblock requests at the same time, neither of which address the reasons for your block, and both of which attack admins for blocking you/not unblocking you. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear @Deepfriedokra
 * Sorry - two unblock requests possibly by mistake :) kindly please consider as one.
 * As it was stated
 * "I certainly will do my best to find a consensus based on facts, possibly involve other people to take unbiased judgment. Can use talk page discussions, focus on content, request other editors' help for content disputes. And believe that Wiki can be a collaborative effort of free-mided people.
 * Moving forward, I assure you that I will be far more attentive to details, follow the established policies and guidelines rigorously, and prioritize neutrality and verifiable sources in my edits. I understand that contributing constructively requires respect and civility, and I am committed to avoiding any form of harassment or disruption"
 * 11 January 2023
 * "I'll try to be more polite in going forward. No harrasment, no disruptivness. Kindly ask to unblock me."
 * 9 December 2023
 * "my intention in wiki is to give more NPOV based on facts, history, logic, actual situation what is happening. No harrasment, no disruptivness"
 * 4 March 2023
 * On top of that I can assure that going forward I will try not to use "Moscovia" term. Though it is purely \ historical term widely used in historical books and archives.
 * As per blocking admin comment @Ymblanter "For the rest, I would be fine with an unblock. They are under scrutiny, and it would be not difficult to reblock if they misbehave"
 * This addresses the reasons for unblock reasoning and a way to go forward with unblocking.
 * Thank you for your help and best regards
 * Lets build a NPOV Wiki Unbiased Scribe (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Just to make it clear I oppose an unblock unless there is an indefinite topic ban to everything related to Russia and Ukraine, broadly construed. Ymblanter (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Concur. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Your signature is misleading. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Any admin should feel free to action this as I'm not around much. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Ymblanter @Deepfriedokra If this helps for unblocking in English wikipedia, I can stop my edits that directly relate to Russo-Ukrainian War. There are a lot of other topics for writing articles Unbiased Scribe (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I am afraid you have difficulties understanding plain English text. I did not write Russo-Ukrainian War (which you may not edit anyway because of WP:RUSUKR), I wrote Russia and Ukraine, broadly construed. There is a big difference between these two. I start doubting that you are actually capable of constructively contributing to Wikipedia. Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. Lets agree on "Russia and Ukraine, broadly construed". Deal? Unbiased Scribe (talk) 19:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This is not my call. You would need to convince an uninvolved administrator. Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thanks. Would be great to get any uninvolved administrator to unblock me and make constructive NPOV edits. Unbiased Scribe (talk) 21:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * From my understanding of the unblock conditions, this editor is topic banned from both Russia and Ukraine, broadly construed. I would imagine that this edit on Dissolution of the Russian Empire is a violation of the topic ban. Mellk (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)