User talk:Stank58

Notability of Stanlee Kelly
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stanlee Kelly, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stanlee Kelly seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stanlee Kelly, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stanlee Kelly
A tag has been placed on Stanlee Kelly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Unusual? Quite TalkQu  11:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Gabion
Is there a reason why you've blanked the entry on Gabions? A quick glance didn't reveal anything inappropriate and the English wiki is now lacking something that is present in many other languages. If I don't hear back from you either here or on my talk page, I'll just revert your edit. JonSenior (talk) 10:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Hi, I've restored your initial page on Stanlee Kelly. If this chap was a genuine pirate, there's no reason it ought to be deleted. Slapping templates around on such articles is a bit WP:BITEy and not really too helpful. Do you have any references to support the facts in the article? Books? It's not really my field I'm afraid, but if there's any editing stuff I can help with, please ask. I'm guessing you're the pirate's namesake? Cool! 8-) Andy Dingley (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Stanlee Kelly for deletion
The article Stanlee Kelly is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stanlee Kelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Another editor had tagged this for speedy deletion. I've replaced this with AfD, as that gives people more time to show references to support it. If you can cite books etc. that show his name, then the article should stay. If you don't, then it's likely that it will be deleted in about a week from now. It shouldn't be deleted in the meantime though, so this is a chance to get the article into order first. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomtopia


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Tomtopia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Syrthiss (talk) 14:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahavir Swami Ji


A tag has been placed on Mahavir Swami Ji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Mahavir Swami Ji, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Sparthorse (talk) 19:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)