User talk:Stanley87

Thanks for the note. The thing is: you might not agree with all the edits, but they are in line with policy. They are only objective reflections of the relevant, high quality WP:RSs. For instance, the "significant" bit you took umbrage to was a direct quote from this academic study. You might like to read up on WP:FOC and WP:CENSOR, since your diagnosis of "anti-Hearts" edits suggests to me you're not quite up to speed on how things work around here yet. Coming at things from that angle could put you in breach of WP:NPOV. For my part, I'm quite new around here too, but let me reassure you I am only interested in a fair and balanced portrayal of the most notable material, taken from the most reliable sources. Thanks again - and good luck! 90.200.240.178 (talk) 22:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply and you're clearly trying your hardest to come across as someone who is actually trying to benefit wikipedia. Clearly, you're only on here to wind people up hence all of your edits are on either a club's or player's page and, from what I've seen, every one of your edits have been a controversial story. Thanks for being patronising but I'm not falling for your act. "Significant" is absolute rubbish and I don't need to read up on something when I have been to hundreds of matches myself. I suppose an "academic study" beats being at the games yourself? This is not just about Hearts. I have seen your other edits on non-Hearts related things and they are all about a similar issue. "Balanced" would suggest you are also contributing positive stories to the wikipedia pages which is clearly not true. I can only hope your IP address gets banned from here. It would be a pity for people to try and find out about a football club on wikipedia and find inaccurate stories and outdated and irrelevant ones (such as the Walters incident). I could go onto the pages of other clubs and players with negative stories but I don't see the point. Thanks again and good luck... stanley87 (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter how many matches we've been to. If you think the material in these reliable sources is "rubbish" then it shouldn't be hard to find a source of equal quality which says so. You are welcome to contribute material from such sources. What you are not welcome to do is try to censor all facts from wikipedia which you think put your club in a bad light. 90.200.240.178 (talk) 11:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you want me to go on to the Celtic/Rangers/Hibs pages and put up a whole bunch of stories about Celtic fans pro-terrorist songs, Derek Riordan singing "Rudi Skacel is a ****ing refugee" etc.? Then, and only then, could I reach your high standards of editing. I wonder how long it would be before someone came along and undid my changes. You have got to be joking? I'm censoring facts? You're the one who is in complete denial about the sectarianism from the Celtic fans. stanley87 (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * this might be of interest given the recent disruption Monkeymanman (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I've had the misfortune of seeing his edits on a number of pages. What annoys me most is that he continues to protest his innocence when I believe it is clear for all to see that all of his edits are done in order to put clubs/players (as long as they have no connection to Celtic) in a bad light. I didn't know anyone cared enough about other clubs to go searching for every single example of racism from any person connected to certain clubs. I also don't believe his "dynamic IP" excuse. I'm sorry if I am getting personal with my responses to him but I've found him particularly difficult to deal with.

"I am only interested in a fair and balanced portrayal of the most notable material"...(as long as it is negative material about clubs that I hate)

Hibs / Hearts rivalry
Welcome!

Hello, Stanley87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

I have added some reliable book sources to the derby section of the Hibernian F.C. article that basically refute the agenda that this idiot is pushing about the Edinburgh derby being comparable to the Old Firm in the sectarian aspect. Might be a good idea to copy and paste it. (see here) Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I've added it now. It might help to stop certain people editing the page but we'll see...stanley87 (talk) 22:22, 17 August 2010 (UTC)