User talk:Stanmarsh97

@Jpgordon Now, well, that's just untrue. I never lied about that sockpuppet. In my UTRS request there, I explicitly stated that I knew what I did was wrong, and that the sockpuppetry pertaining to the Phillips Academy was a clear violation of rules, hence why I have agreed to a topic ban. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ahem. Might I refresh your memory? Best, &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Concur with standard offer &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm aware of both of those things. I already brought to your attention the UTRS request on that account, in which I explicitly admitted to usage of that sockpuppet account. I also, as previously mentioned, haven't been editing logged out or with a different IP address than the one I was originally blocked on. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 22:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

@331dot @Yamla What is the standard offer process? I haven't evaded my block since I was initially blocked as an accused sockpuppet of @Tintinthereporter226 and @Pohjamadesse1. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:SO. We're going to need more than your word here; the SO is a way tp give a show of good faith that you can abide by instructions and policies. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, it's been almost 6 months since this account was blocked, which is why I took the decision to mention this here in an effort to establish some progress. I don't know how much more transparent I can be when I say I haven't been evading my block, or editing logged out, aside from providing my IP address, which I'm obviously not going to do in a public forum. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Block evasion
@331dot I was not evading my block. I'm trying to garner support for an RfC on the Talk:Al Gore page. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I have no additional comment about this matter, other than to reiterate that I agree with Jpgordon that you should wait until July; you may make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, you accused @92.40.213.240 and associated IPs of block evasion, when all they were doing was garnering support for a rightful removal of a paragraph at an RfC. And I thought that it would now have been reset to August 19, 2024 since I've been accused of evading my block twice already. Stanmarsh97 (talk) 17:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why do you keep referring to those IP addresses in the third person? It was quite obviously you using those IPs, and creating an "enemies list". I think we've wasted enough time here. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 19:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Unblock request
Stanmarsh97 (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 19:43, 19 February 2024 (UTC)