User talk:StarScream1007/Archive8

Thanks
For all your care of the Walter Payton article. Novickas (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Well you've been patiently addressing things there for so long without getting recognition. :( So. The statue issue probably should go in but I've been thinking it would get neatly resolved; maybe not. Yr thoughts? Novickas (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Brad Maynard
Sorry someone hacked my accounnt as you see I'm actaully a huge bears fan but he is a packers fan. I'm sorry for the inconvienence and thank you for not banning me. I can assure you that the vandilism will stop. Thank you. Thank you so much. I have already changed my passwords and will start becoming a productive member of wikipedia again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blt33 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

It was made by Logitech
The picture was actually from the Logitech website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logitech_G35.png —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neo The User (talk • contribs) 18:29, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

halo ce
Did you play halo custom edition during the afternoon yesterday? (technically since it's 3am ET) It might be a coincidence but someone played with me as StarScream. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.25.86 (talk) 08:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, that was not me. I do not play Halo CE; given the popularity of the name "Starscream", it could have been anyone. Good luck finding him (or her). Happy Holidays. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  12:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Apology
Hey.. Sorry for what happened on the Devin Aromashodu page. My friend took my computer, and was acting like a jack ass. Sorry about that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.164.193 (talk) 18:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Your information about his current girlfriend is wrong.
He is not dating currently dating Tamara James.

Here is a picture of his new baby. Posted on his Twitter page. http://twitpic.com/pa0ge

Here is a picture of his current girlfriend (Zingha Walcott). http://twitpic.com/kqpee and here is her Twitter page: http://twitter.com/GottaLoveZingha

If you check his twit on 11:28 AM Nov 11th, 2009 you will see that the babies name is Devin Amir Hester Jr.

Here are more pictures of the couple: http://thesebootsaremadeforstalking.com/?p=12634 and http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20090304/ent/ent5.html

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/268722-chicago-bears-devin-hester-expecting-baby-boy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.52.254 (talk) 12:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

...so can you remove my violation warning and change the incorrect information in his personal section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.191.52.254 (talk) 12:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

And you call yourself a Bears fan?
Somebody vandalized List of Chicago Bears players on December 1, somebody else corrected it January 14, and then later that day, you reverted the corrections. Not cool. TresÁrboles (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

We can't control what other people watch or edit, but we can control what we ourselves edit. TresÁrboles (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Johnny Knox
I'm glad we found some common ground on the pro-bowl idea, but what I had initially envisioned was making it look like '1x Pro-Bowl Selection (2010*)' With the asterisk denoting at the end of the list of awards/recognition *"Selected as an Alternate", if that makes any sense. I just don't know how to format something like that. If you like that idea, and know of a way to implement it, have at it. If not, the way you have it doesn't look bad either. Just thinking aloud. Pakman325 (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Chicago Bears FAR
nominated Chicago Bears for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 20:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm Too Old For This Shit
I've been a bit busy and missed the RE merge discussions, thank you for bringing them to my attention though. Damn real life and its constant interruptions. I'm back, in some sort of semi-regular capacity now! Geoff B (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Rex Grossman
You bring up those, but how about Phillip Buchanon, Ronnie Brown, Steve Smith (American football, born 1985)‎, LaDainian Tomlinson, Joey Porter and many many more. Me, User:Giants27, User:Eagles247, User:Chrisjnelson are all just trying to have consistency in NFL articles. All of the info does not have to be in the intro when it is already under the sections--Yankees10 16:27, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Linkin Park Moderation
Appreciate you moderating the LP article, too many fans flooding Wikipedia with speculative information. Saw that your semi-retired, understand that for sure, thanks for the help on this one though. (also we seem to have a lot of similar interests according to your user talk page :p) cstebila (talk) 02:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Double Trouble
I'm really ticked off at you; you nominate a page I worked quite hard on and didn't even give me the courtesy to alert me? That is not cool at all. At least take the time to examine the article before you delete it; the article was team, not NFL, lore.  Toa   Nidhiki  05  19:52, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Angry Video Game Nerd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Angry Video Game Nerd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Angry Video Game Nerd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Will Beback   talk    23:35, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

SC2 LAN IMAGE
Hi StarScream,

Actually I could use a bit of help with the right way to label the image that was uploaded.

It was a screenshot that another person took from the MLG stream of the Starcraft 2 tournament. However the screenshot was not of the gameplay, but of the audience.

I got permission to use it from the person who did the screencap, and it seemed like fair use rules allowed me to post it here. But I'm not quite clear on where I went wrong.

Any advice would be appreciated :)

EDIT: I've updated the sourcing and I think it will meet wikipedia requirements now. I'm going to re-add the image, but please let me know if I'm missing something or could clarify things better.

My understanding is that since this is a single screenshot from a 3-day event it easily falls under the fair-use criteria. Listed under "acceptable use" in the WP:fair use article "Film and television screen shots: For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television"

Zuchinni one (talk) 02:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for double checking what I did and for letting me know about this :) Zuchinni one (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Dave Farrell
Can you please tell me where my discussion page is? I don't know where it is at. You said that you sent links there that would help me possibly revive the Dave Farrell Wikipedia page. Thanks Mrbeastmodeallday (talk) 6:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Here you go --   StarScream1007  ►Talk  22:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Tyrant
Hey StarScream, i disagree with your revert. The events have already in the RE universe, making past tense preferrable per Manual of Style. You've quoted a guideline to me, which is not policy and which i also find no mention of this in. Please clarify. Thanks ツ Je no va  20  (email) 09:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Linkin Park
Hey StarScream1007 how goes it? You might be interested in commenting here -> Talk Linkin Park.  STATic  message me!  02:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Mike Shinoda
Hey StarScream! I wanted a bit of help from you. Can you just try to improve the page of Mike Shinoda so that it could be included in the list of good articles. It would be big help. Regards! Mike: Golu  · [ Confidential message ] 08:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey! Thanx for your edits for the article. Now it's far better then before. Keep it Up! I'm really thank full to you! Mike: Golu  · [ Confidential message ] 13:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey StarScream! I think the article now should be given the B-Class according to the Quality scale for WikiProject Biography / Musicians, WikiProject Rock music, WikiProject Metal and WikiProject Hip hop. Mike: Golu   · [ Confidential message ] 04:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

No More Sorrow
I noticed that you deleted my article.I've Cited the references now.And you said it has no notability.The song has been released as a promotional single and has been included in many LP live albums, soundtracks etc.The song also charted at 24 in Under 100 singles chart.Isn't it enough to have some notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samparee (talk • contribs) 06:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

No More Sorrow
I did read your replay.But a promo single and a charted song needs its own article.Despite the article is containing fansite sources, they've worked hard to get these infos.And the article on LPA wiki is true.Brad does perform an Ebow in that song and anybody who can listen to the song can know it.And the proof of it being a promo single is the artwork.Also i've mentioned other sources other than fansites.Instead of deleting it, you can help me expand the article if you know something other than what is there in the article.If you delete it some other person, someday will recreate the article.If the article stays then,person who has knowledge about the song can expand it. Edit:I've removed the fansite sources and added new ones.Please don't remove the article, i'm working on it to expand it and finding reliable sources. I find some major mistakes in some LP related Wikipedia articles.For example, Wikipedia states that "Fort Minor Militia" is an EP.There was no Fort Minor Militia EP.Its fanmade.And many articles like A Place For My Head,Lies Greed Misery have less content than no more sorrow.So please take my request into count. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samparee (talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Linkin Park - Phoenix and Chester Bennington
I've changed the time sequence for him because he actually rejoined the band back in either October or November 2000, there's evidence of this: a performance where he is performing with Linkin Park, which is the earliest time where he is witnessed being seen on camera after the band changed the name from Hybrid Theory to Linkin Park.

I've also changed Chester Bennington timeline, he joined the band back in March 1999, on March 17th, 1999, was when Hybrid Theory (Shinoda & Delson) send him the Xero tape (vocals on one side and instrumental on the other side). It arrived to him the next day (the 18th). He listened to the tracks and then wrote his own lyrics part of the tracks then called up the band and sang his vocals part over the instrumental part of the song. They invited him to come out to Los Angeles to audition. On the 20th, His 23rd birthday, he talked to his boss at Burger King restaurant, and she told him that he'll still have his job if he doesn't make the part in the band, so he got his wife and kids and headed toward LA. I don't know when the official day of the audition was, all I know it was within the 6 days after his birthday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.1 Jibbz (talk • contribs) 20:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikiproject
Please come and help the articles get better! And please invite your contacts too! Thank You! Mike: Golu  · [ Confidential message ] 07:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Linkin Park lawsuit
I've listened to Bring Me The Horizon's new album "That's The Spirit", its sounds similar to Linkin Park's Meteora album. It seems like the Linkin Park program was stolen from the studio after the making of their Meteora album. I was a fan since 2002, and I remember by 2003, I heard of the ComputerCore program that Linkin Park use for making their music, they used that program on shows, so the songs can sound the same as the album. After the Minutes To Midnight album was made, Linkin Park shows didn't sound the same and you can even see it during the Meteora World Tour: Projekt Revolution, the equipment was different, Bennington didn't show that energy of the vocal play found on the album. You can even see the changed in the instrumental portions of the songs after 2003.2.1 Jibbz (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Paul Walker
Hey, people are saying that Paul faked his death, I'm not really sure on that, could you confirm for me. Thank.

This is a video that I found and there some more around the internet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuSfzF0V4Sg.

2.1 Jibbz (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Kane Article
There is a quote in the Kane article concerning the rape investigation that is misattributed to police commissioner John Glascott. It was actually said by the victim's attorney Thomas Eoannou. 72.128.83.135 (talk) 01:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Jake

Resident Evil 5
Hi StarScream1007. As you are still the article's top contributor, you may have noticed that I put Resident Evil 5 through a bit of an overhaul a while ago, and successfully nominating it for GA. I have intentions to nominate this article for FAC at some point in the future (probably early next year at this stage, though we'll see what happens). Anyway i'm just wondering if you're still interested in working on it at all? I understand you're semi-retired now, so no worries if you don't want to work on it. Even if you don't want to work on it you could do me favour by nominating it for either a peer review or a copyedit, or both. As usual, I am currently maxed out with nominations at both those areas and won't be able to nominate it myself for some time, so you'd save me some time if you did; you wouldn't be required to follow up either nomination. But no worries if you're not comfortable doing that. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 14:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Grossman in a post-game interview in 2006.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grossman in a post-game interview in 2006.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, just wanted to update you on this image. I messaged the Flickr user directly and he was kind enough to change the license of his Flickr upload to cc-by-sa-2.0. I transferred the image to Commons, which just needs a quick Flickr review. Cheers! — ξ xplicit  05:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nachtmystium-live.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nachtmystium-live.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)