User talk:Star Fiver

Hi Dear
Please help for complete this articls. thank you dearing 50 mfreestyle ,100 m freestyle ,200 m freestyle ,400 m freestyle ,800 m freestyle ,50 m backstroke ,100 m backstroke ,200 m backstroke ,50 m breaststroke ,100 m breaststroke ,200 m breaststroke ,50 m butterfly ,100 m butterfly ,200 m butterfly Hello, Star Fiver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reference Errors on 15 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * On the List of Chilean records in swimming page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=638224900 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F638224900%7CList of Chilean records in swimming%5D%5D Ask for help])

March 2021
Your recent editing history at Soybean shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd  (talk)  14:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:C.J. Griffin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ''... and at User talk:Psychologist Guy. Your comments on these user talk pages are based from your personal opinions, rather than WP:RS-supported sources. Your editing is disruptive, WP:DE, and you are in danger of being blocked.'' Zefr (talk) 16:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Psychologist Guy (talk) 15:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Psychologist Guy (talk) 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * Your recent misconduct is unacceptable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  18:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)