User talk:Star of Amman

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

in re 'No Country for Old Men'
Hi. Please use summaries for each edit. I also think it would be better if you submitted your changes in small increments so each can be reviewed more easily. Thanks. El duderino (talk) 08:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, "very few" it is. Let's see how it feels. --Ring Cinema (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * While I have your attention, I thought I would mention that I have some questions about the attention you have given to the thematic sections. Of course, it's "95% positive" to bring this material to the fore that makes explicit so many interesting aspects of and responses to the film. However, I feel that out of a sense of proportion there might need to be some selection made in the future. How do you feel about that? You are clearly drawing on many sources and so have the best view of the iceberg, so to say. Do you think when the time comes that this section would benefit from more concision or that it would be a distortion? Have you contemplated that? --Ring Cinema (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Star, please join the discussion on the talk page. Earlier I suggested using edit summaries for your content additions but I did not mean to use them in place of talkpage conversation, especially when there is a content dispute. I appreciate your latest attempt at compromise but I think that approach has a few problems, mainly that it gives too much prominence to the aggregate site (RT) up front. We should be able to reach a compromise on the wording. Thanks. El duderino (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

This guideline suggests that a section simply for the purpose of covering the differences between a novel and film is discouraged. We should give some thought to how we are handling this. --Ring Cinema (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

I wonder why ... I thought it makes the article stronger ... shall we take it to discussion ... or shall we delete (in which case I prefer to delete it) --Star of Amman (talk) 19:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Personally, I find it interesting how the Coens changed it. Maybe the reasoning is that it is not about the film. But it's not expressly about the novel either! Of course, this type of thing can devolve into tedious minutiae. Shall we leave it for now and await developments? --Ring Cinema (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

I would leave it for now and wait for complaints ... just like you said: This is an interesting and classic/unique example in adaptation (got them the Oscar) ... at least and if complaints rise, I may suggest then to move the quoted articles to "Further Reading". The subject matter is too interesting to be deleted ... If deleted, I would be going back to the archives and reading about it! --Star of Amman (talk) 03:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ben Johnson and Enigma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not the editor who inserted these. It was another editor. I'm ready to assist if there is anything else ~Star of Amman 22:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

No Country for Old Men (film)
No Country for Old Men (film), an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIR corn (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

No Country for Old Men (film)
No Country for Old Men (film), an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIR corn (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar awarded!
Dear Jusdafax, This means a lot. Thanks for your appreciation. ~Star of Amman 03:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from multiple sources, per WP:NFC Section 3.2.1, Unacceptable use, "Excessively long copyrighted excerpts, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I am notifying you because I am supposed to notify the editor who added the copyrighted information. I took a guess that you were the one based on edit history, where you appear to be the most prolific editor on this article when it was still just a section of the film's main article. If you were not the editor who added this copyrighted information, then please accept my apologies. Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)