User talk:Starbeam2

Your thread has been archived
Hey Starbeam, why did you remove the table with the future tense forms and past tense forms in the Modern Hebrew conjugation article? Now it is way less clear how the conjugation works than it was previously, so would you restore it?Merijn2 (talk) 17:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I removed it because it's largely predictable, and a giant bulky table seemed to be kind of annoying to memorize. I can put something back for them if need be. But please tell me you didn't/ won't touch the rest of the stuff i changed. Starbeam2 (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

OK Thankyou!Merijn2 (talk) 09:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Voice casts in video game articles
Hi there. Sorry to undo so much if your work, but please see WP:GAMECRUFT point #11. Wikipedia doesn’t include voice casts in articles. Thats probably why you were finding so many popular articles that didn’t have them. Anyways, just wanted to let you know so you don’t waste any more time on that. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  22:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the BTVA sourcing
Hello there. Since you're relatively new to the project (and if you haven't done so), I would like to direct you to the WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources, which contains very useful information on how to use sources for anime and manga (including the voice actors). The actual details for using BTVA as a source are in the situational section; please note that "Roles and lists that are not check-marked (covered by a screenshot), despite being listed under that actor, cannot be used. BTVA Award sections can be used, but only the staff's choice (not people's choice) is notable for wins. Other site sections such as actor biographical data, trivia, side-by-sides, voice-matching analysis, polls, credits count, and forum sections are not verified and should not be used." If you have any problems, please drop a line here, or on my talk page. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German exonyms (Vojvodina), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krajišnik ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/German_exonyms_%28Vojvodina%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/German_exonyms_%28Vojvodina%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve List of German exonyms for places in France
Hello, Starbeam2,

Thank you for creating List of German exonyms for places in France.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of German exonyms for places in Italy


A tag has been placed on List of German exonyms for places in Italy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/List of German exonyms for places in Italy. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hog Farm (talk) 02:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I noticed that in this edit to Greek exonyms, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 08:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crashbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raj.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parasite Dolls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jay Hickman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of irregularly spelt places in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elmsall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Modern Hebrew Verbs: Tables
Dear Starbeam2,

When refactoring the tables in Modern Hebrew verbs, please try and keep all entries previously made that details conjugations intact. Also, avoid "WIP" edits, not best practice in updating information, it's better to publish completed edits than to have missing information. I'm reverting some tables back, but will incorporate your edits as they present additional information, as well as being more neat & concise.

Just a quick little formatting thing with tables, use of "  " for new lines within a table, makes it a little more compact for what you're aiming for! Thank you for your time in reading this, hope this isn't too much of an upset for you, and appreciate the effort work you've put into this.

Kind regards,

EruannoVG (talk) 03:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for giving me the heads up on my edits, as well as keeping my design and information. I really appreciate it.


 * Tho, I should mention I used visual editor whenever possible to save time, so I'm unsure what much of your instructions would have me do. I also do work-in-progress mentions on longer articles (such as the Hebrew verbs article and List of stage names), as I am unable to do swooping edits in my sandbox or in one go for technical reasons. Again, I only use visual editor for scratch work, so maybe there's a trick I'm missing to getting larger edits done in a single update?
 * Starbeam2 (talk) 03:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Starbeam2,
 * My means of editing is just using Wikitext markup where I've used "  ", as well as a text editor program to edit different lines simultaneously. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Visual Editor is (I had to look it up!) so I'm unable to help there for the time being sorry.
 * What I meant by complete rather than WIP was that parts changed must be complete before submitting, e.g. work and complete 1 or 2 tense conjugation tables, submit, then work on the next tables, rather than changing all the tables and not filling the details in. Don't worry too much about larger edits, that can quickly get frustrating to handle and manage!
 * I hope that answers your questions. All the best to your future edits!
 * Kind regards,
 * EruannoVG (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A Thousand and One Nights (1969 film) English cast
Hello! According to the edit history on the page for A Thousand and One Nights (1969 film) it looks like you added the English cast for the movie's dub to Wikipedia. Do you remember where you got that information? I'm trying to find a source for it and I haven't had much luck yet. Thanks for your help! (Amonduul (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC))


 * Most of the cast is sourced by ear, from deductions done on BehindTheVoiceActors "Whose Voice Is This" forums using comparisons with other movies by the same dub studio (Spa Roma). The exception to the rule is Frederick Neumann as Aldin, who is also the director. Roman-English dubs had the same person as the director dub the lead. To be clear, I neither made the deductions nor do i represent BTVA.Starbeam2 (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know, I appreciate it! Amonduul (talk) 22:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bulgarian exonyms and other articles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted: • Bulgarian exonyms (authorship)

• Catalan exonyms (authorship)

• Danish exonyms (authorship)

• Dutch exonyms (authorship)

• English exonyms (authorship)

• Estonian exonyms (authorship)

• Finnish exonyms (authorship)

• French exonyms (authorship)

• German exonyms (authorship)

• List of English exonyms for German toponyms (authorship)

• List of German exonyms for places in Belgium (authorship)

• List of German exonyms for places in Croatia (authorship)

• List of German exonyms for places in Poland (authorship)

• Greek exonyms (authorship)

• Hungarian exonyms (authorship)

• Irish exonyms (authorship)

• Italian exonyms (authorship)

• Lithuanian exonyms (authorship)

• Maltese exonyms (authorship)

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of names of European cities in different languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gamba no Bouken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

List of stage names beginning with X moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of stage names beginning with X, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roujin Z, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ian Thompson and Adam Henderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Scots link in Z
Hey so, last year you changed a link in Z to point to Scottish Gaelic instead of Scots language. It was in the comparison table you made, which originally had Scots pointing to Scots language. So, User:HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith was confused about that and asked why "Scots" pointed to Scottish Gaelic in the talk page. I ended up changing the link to point to Modern Scots, since that seemed correct, but if it really should point to Scots Gaelic then just come to the talk page. Erinius (talk) 09:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I meant to put in Scots, i must have made a mistake. Thanks for catching that, actually. Starbeam2 (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks for the clarification! Have a great rest of your day. Erinius (talk) 17:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ultimate Teacher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Henderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

List of stage names
Why are you removing the links when you make your tables? This makes the list much less useful. --Khajidha (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a matter of time. The page takes an eternity to load with all those names on one single page, so i have to enter names one day and links another. Starbeam2 (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of stage names beginning with X
Hello, Starbeam2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of stage names beginning with X, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of stage names beginning with X


Hello, Starbeam2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of stage names beginning with X".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of stage names


A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of stage names indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of stage names beginning with X


Hello, Starbeam2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of stage names beginning with X".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Krohn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Krohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aaron Krohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Qualms with your changes to "Anglo-Saxon runes"
Some of the changes you made to the article on Anglo-Saxon runes are strange. Letter names aren't usually capitalised. A bunch of the rune name spellings you added aren't from the surviving rune charts, and aren't standardised/modernised spellings of those names. The Letter column you added to the rune combination chart is puzzling. Hurlebatte (talk) 03:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Letter names are capitalized because they're proper nouns. I truthfully don't understand how copying exact transcription quirks of runes is necessary in a chart meant to introduce them.
 * The letter name spellings are not from the surviving rune charts, but they are the words being referred to and the charts still contain the cited form. Orthography everywhere was freeform and only relatively consistent for centuries on end, so it helps to have an indexable spelling. As for the standardizations, what do you mean? Keep in mind the runic labels are the only time  is used for anything Old English.
 * Lastly, the "letter column" labels the rune letters making a cluster. There's nothing else to that. Starbeam2 (talk) 04:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think letter names are traditionally capitalised, and this is reflected elsewhere on Wikipedia.
 * Some of the rune name spellings you inserted aren't just unusual, they're completely unattested, and some even use letters that aren't in Old English. For example, you have "Ødil (ǿþel)" written for ᛟ.
 * Labelling the runes in the combination chart is redundant because the preceding chart gives the names of the runes already. Hurlebatte (talk) 14:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Why do the letter/ rune names have to be lowercase? Those are proper names distinct from anything else, and i'm not the type to do things simply because they've always been done a certain way. I'm not going to die on the hill, but i feel i'm missing key information.
 * I have seen <ø> used for scholarly writings of Old English, marking dialects that had the phoneme. I know the exact <ø> letter is a modern indexing convention, like the marking of long vowels, and did not occur in the corpus of the language itself. Plus, most of the writing is for and on West Saxon, which lacked it. Generally speaking, i do not see the need to use verbatim transcriptions; given spelling was variable for centuries, the fact it only represented the scribe's singular dialect, and that much of what is posted is not a direct quote. Again, not a hill i will die on.
 * As for labelling runes in the combination chart, it's to sort them easier. But i get it takes up space. Starbeam2 (talk) 18:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Shared standards have various benefits, which is why there's a trend in modern times towards shared standards.
 * The spellings you inserted aren't attested at all, and they use letters Anglo-Saxons never used like J and Ø. You're downplaying the strangeness of these spellings. Hurlebatte (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, standardized systems have benefits. They also have flaws, i'm not asking to do things idiosyncratically.
 * As for the spellings  and <ø>: Ø has been used before me, just only in scholarly transcriptions. The  matches cognate runes. The purpose overall is to have one rune = one letter. Regardless, i realize it's not worth me arguing over, so it's not a big deal if you edit it back. Starbeam2 (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of French exonyms for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article French exonyms, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/French exonyms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)