User talk:StarbriteQueen

Edit Summaries
Also, please remember to leave edit summaries when you edit in Wikipedia, as it makes it easier for other editors to understand what you have done and why. Best, Kukini 02:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi StarbriteQueen. Thank you for adding citations to comming and goings on the page All My Children. I added the "verification needed" tags because someone kept adding false stuff. But thank you for providing a source. Eng 03:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Dan Cashman
Do you have a photo of Dan Cashman (actor)? AaronSw 19:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio warning
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note by user StarbriteQueen, it was not myself but my cousin who got on my computer that did it and I talk to her about it and that was stupid and you can get in trouble. I am don't copyright. StarbriteQueen (talk) 03:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Ryan's Hope characters
Please see the messages I left at Talk:List of Ryan's Hope characters. I am contacting you as you appear to be the main contributor to this article. Please alert others as necessary.

I'm not sure if you're aware of the guideline at WP:LIST, so I thought I best draw your attention to it whilst I was here.

NullofWest (talk) 18:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that - now I can address my other concerns without having to bother you NullofWest (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexa Gerasimovich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexa Gerasimovich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexa Gerasimovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --> Gggh  talk/contribs 23:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathryn Feller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I corrected the mistake, my computer key stick and s on the end States wasn't type in. Thanks for point that out. StarbriteQueen (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pete Cortlandt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Cortlandt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pete Cortlandt & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wlmg (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Taylor Anne Mountz


The article Taylor Anne Mountz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Profiler (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hans Beimler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Hammon


The article Jennifer Hammon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:BLP article unsourced since 2007. Almost certainly fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jennifer Hammon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Hammon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jennifer Hammon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Warwick (The Bold and the Beautiful)


The article James Warwick (The Bold and the Beautiful) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nola Falacci for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nola Falacci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nola Falacci until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Seth Adkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seth Adkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Seth Adkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seth Adkins


The article Seth Adkins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade; &sect; ( Message ) -  13:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marley McClean


The article Marley McClean has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CallyMc (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

NFCC discussion for Bridgette Andersen
There is an ongoing discussion about whether the image in the infobox at Bridgette Andersen passes WP:NFCC. Since you recently edited the article, we would appreciate it if you could join the discussion at Talk:Bridgette Andersen. Aspects (talk) 23:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Marisa Petroro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisa Petroro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marisa Petroro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. B dash (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Children of Guiding Light


The article Children of Guiding Light has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Trivial list of characters that do not appear to require coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eleni Andros Cooper


The article Eleni Andros Cooper has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mike Kasnoff


The article Mike Kasnoff has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Custody (2007 film)


The article Custody (2007 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  01:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Orbach


The article Chris Orbach has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sourced from actor's own website. No showing of notability or SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Montano for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Montano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert Montano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 22:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hunter King, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't make mistakes. It just air on the hallmark channel StarbriteQueen (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)