User talk:Stardsen

Hêr sprekad gî tô mî.

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Saxon grammar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch, English and German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to remove disambiguations, could one help me doing it? --Stardsen (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * This disambiguation message is mostly just a maintenance message. If you want to fix the links, check the linked disambiguation pages (German (disambiguation) for example) for a more specific, direct link and replace it in the article. For example, using "German" in a language-related article would likely better point to "German language" (replace German with the piped link German) as the more relevant topic, or to "Germany" for other more general usages of the term as adjective. GermanJoe (talk) 07:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Saxon phonology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch and English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Categories "Old Saxony" <-> "Old Saxon language"
Hello Stardsen, i noticed you added the language category to Otto I and other articles about German dukes and kings. I am not sure, this is the intended usage for this category (but then, i am relatively unfamiliar with categories). From a quick check language-related categories are used for language articles about dialects, grammar or notable works in the language, not necessarily for all persons speaking that language. I have reverted that addition to Otto I for now, but would be happy to discuss, if you disagree. Regards. GermanJoe (talk) 07:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry it's true that it doesn't have to do with it^^ thanks for fixing up :) --Stardsen (talk) 16:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Just as a quick note, you don't have to add 2 categories, if one of them is an obvious sub-category of the other (f.e. "Old Saxon language" is fully included as sub-category of "Old Saxony", so it is redundant to add "Old Saxony" again). GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * John the Old Saxon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Alfred, Frankish, Greek, Germanic, King Edward, Gandersheim and Harbinger

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * all fixed now, I removed the dablink --Stardsen (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

John the Old Saxon
Stardsen: Thank you for writing up John the Old Saxon. I improved it a little bit. However, I need to point out two things to you. First and relatively unimportant, don't link individual years; We don't do that on this Wikipedia. Second and a lot more important: I discovered that the text was basically lifted wholesale from the ODNB entry. This is copyright violation and a serious matter. Listing the source at the end of the article or even in footnotes is not sufficient; articles must be in editors' own words, and preferably summarised. I've done my best to recast it, but if you have copied text into other articles, please go back and substitute a summary in your own words. Footnotes tell the reader where you got the information, and where to look for more detail; it is never necessary to use someone else's words except in brief quotations (for example when referring to one scholar or critic's opinion about something). Yngvadottir (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germanic calendar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slaughter and Springtime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Old Saxon phonology: palatalized spirant G
Ƿes þu hal, Stardsen,

In Old Saxon phonology, I noticed that you refer to what I believe to be a heavily palatalized spirant allophone of Old Saxon /g/ as [ɣj].

Perhaps it would be better to refer to it as [ɣʲ] or [ʝ]? What do your sources say about it?

Espreon (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Old Saxon language
Category:Old Saxon language, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Briga (Gallo-Roman town) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Briga (Gallo-Roman town), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx Talk ? 00:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Briga (Gallo-Roman town)
Hello, Stardsen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Briga (Gallo-Roman town), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Briga (Gallo-Roman town)


Hello, Stardsen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Briga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)