User talk:Starflame4

July 2022
Hello, I'm ProClasher97. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ProClasher 9 7  ~  Have A Question?  18:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * What part was biased?
 * To quote an islamic hadith text on a hadith scholar in my opinion is not biased. Firstly this is how we even know of the existence of the author (through islamic sources).
 * This is no different than quoting church father views on a scholar like Origen.
 * In hadith studies the status of the scholar is actually a vital part of the science. It has to be known wheter he was known collectively as a liar, had mental issues etc. If not then they would narrate how good that person was recognized as in the field. Starflame4 (talk) 05:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)