User talk:Starfox93


 * }

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Toys "R" Us. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toys_%22R%22_Us&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Toys "R" Us, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. EricSerge (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Toys "R" Us, you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Toys "R" Us
Hello. I couln't help but notice your interest in the article on Toys "R" Us. What do you think of this assessment that the "Toys“R”Us, U.S." section seems too much like an advert for the company? And in general, do you think that the article needs to be checked for its neutrality? Thanks, Several Pending (talk) 18:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)