User talk:Starglint

This is FROM Starglint. I was Ninian's student from 1967 at Lancaster and my edit referencing his kindly accessibility is from direct personal experience as I struggled to decide on Anglican ordination talking about eg factual reliability of oral tradition collected in the Gospels
 * That is precisely the kind of support for a statement in Wikipedia that we do NOT like. We require reliable independent written sources that state what you added. I knew Ninian too and your statement is correct, but that is not enough. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  06:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Please specify who 'WE' is. Perhaps that is a form of ad hominem attack 'WE' are NOT you Mr Morrison. Thank you for we now have two witnesses affirming that Ninian was approachable. It seems you 'WE' want to privilege even reify the published written over reported oral testimony. That seems pretentious which Ninian never was. If you are accusing me of being 'unreliable' please provide your evidence. As for 'independent' as I was one of his first students at Lancaster also privileged with a Peel Scholarship part of which included residence in a local Monastery I was very much a participant observer affirming my subjective experience of the quality of the man for by no other means could that attribute to which I attested be experienced or reliably reported other than subjectively.