User talk:Starjammer

Very Good catch
But when they actually tested it: http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=3182&page_number=1 It performed in 4.7sec to 60. Fast but not faster then the vette. Wait for more tests and if it quarters faster then the vette it belongs on the table. May need to click http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0602_exige_data_panel.pdf Speeddemonvegas 06:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Also the supercharged version could make it... http://www.caranddriver.com/previews/11968/2007-lotus-exige-s.html I am sticking it on the list at 4.1...it probably makes it acording to article ...for 57,915 Speeddemonvegas 06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I am trying to make a handling list as well which the lotus would certainly make but am as yet undecided on what stat to use...ie Slalom, Cornering G on skid pad. Time on the nurburring would be good but not perfect. I also thought about a pure bang for the buck list but there is no way I could make it objective....

Image copyright problem with Image:Lotuscircuit01.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lotuscircuit01.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)