User talk:Starleca

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo 2935.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo 2935.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:National Semiconductor logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:National Semiconductor logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Powerwise
A tag has been placed on Powerwise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Powerwise and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Anome (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Regarding your request: I'm sorry, but it's written in the style of advertising copy and thus can't be kept without a substantial rewrite. Deleted. -- The Anome (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Powerwise
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Powerwise, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.national.com/news/item/0,1735,1281,00.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Powerwise
A tag has been placed on Powerwise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  TN ‑ X - Man  13:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of PowerWise
A tag has been placed on PowerWise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Stephenb (Talk) 07:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to National Semiconductor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: National Semiconductor was changed by Starleca (u) (t) deleting 12728 characters on 2008-06-20T08:44:17+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

additions to National Semiconductor
I've reverted your recent edits to National Semiconductor. Most of the material you added was basically an advertisement. There are details on how to present this material at neutral tone of voice. Phrases like National is a world leader and National's Boomer® audio amplifiers enhance and enrich sound like a company press release. Also, based on patented, proprietary VIP10 processes, you might want to consider finding the patent and linking it into the article, it will add more validity. Yngvarr (c) 10:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

National Semiconductor
I've once again reverted your edits to National Semiconductor. You are attempting to turn this into an advertisement, so I'd like you to review WP:NOT and see why these things are not appropriate, and also WP:NPOV as to the tone of the article. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)