User talk:Starman2377

Draft:Centurion Law Group
Can you please be a little more careful when reverting edits. Here you just reinstated a copyright violation with no explanation.  Hut 8.5  20:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry. Im new to fixing vandalism. ill try to look at what im reverting.

Teahouse solution
You tried helping someone who was helping me ask my question. Could you delete that and ask me? ~ 0crock 6:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you link it to me? Starman2377 (talk) 18:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't think I could find it if I tried, but it was in the teahouse and it was about the Battle Bots and Red Devil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0crock (talk • contribs) 19:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, i was trying to help you. I fixed it. Starman2377 (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk page indentation
Hi, please have a look at WP:INDENT. Thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I was indenting but i stopped because i thought it took up to much space. Ill try and do it again. Starman2377 (talk) 19:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dead people
Hi, can you please stop adding Category:Dead people to uncategorised biographical articles? The banner on the category shows that it is a container category which should only contain subcategories, and the intro says "Please do not add individual people to this category; instead add them to the appropriate year of death category." Also with articles like Altair Franco Ferreira, these should have a much more refined category than Category:Brazilian Army – I suggest Category:Brazilian military personnel or even better one of the subcategories there. Thanks, --Canley (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Thank you for pointing this out. I will not do this things from now on. Starman2377 (talk) 13:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Starman2377. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AStarman2377 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! The SandDoctor Talk 06:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Vinny Vinesauce moved to draftspace with a chance of deletion
An article you recently created, Vinny Vinesauce, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Moonlight Vector  18:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC) Thank you.

AfC notification: Draft:Vinny Vinesauce has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vinny Vinesauce. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Online newspapers published in India


A tag has been placed on Category:Online newspapers published in India indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vinny Vinesauce
Hello, Starman2377. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vinny Vinesauce, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vinny Vinesauce


Hello, Starman2377. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vinny Vinesauce".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Orleans Breakers (2023)


A tag has been placed on Category:New Orleans Breakers (2023) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Simpsons (season 34) episodes


A tag has been placed on Category:The Simpsons (season 34) episodes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Moai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. as well as WP:OR/unsourced additions -- ferret (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add back broken code for images, as you did at Pamphlet. If you had, used your eyes, you would have noticed that the code you incorrectly added back, is broken. The image, however, still exists, but I have deemed it to be a poor example, and since the markup for it was already broken, I removed it. If you believed that the image was a good fit for the article, maybe don't blindly add it back without checking the article and not start a Talk Page discussion. Also, if I am wrong in leaving this message, feel free to point out how you disagree, and we can sort it out. If I'm right, may you kindly rescind the warning you left on my talk page. 151.188.25.140 (talk) 17:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It appears another editor has repaired the syntax, but my point still stands. 151.188.25.140 (talk) 17:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your point really doesn't stand. While the syntax was broken, removing the image and it's caption wholesale was improper. -- ferret (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I forgot i this stuff happened, ill make sure to be careful and look at the code next time. Thanks Starman2377 (talk) 17:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Merger of Drawbar eye
Thank you for merging this article. However, you did not include the references for some reason. Was that intentional. I added them. You also did not give proper attribution per WP:CWW and you did not left a comment at the top of Drawbar eye instead of following the instructions at WP:MERGE. You need to put the merged to template on the Talk Page and then redirect the article. MB 19:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Got it@MB Starman2377 (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * was not intentional btw Starman2377 (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Kanye West. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Muboshgu Got it, sorry Starman2377 (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello Starman2377. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Tim Lamont. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), patent nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. We normally wait an hour to allow the creator time to expand the article (except of course, if the page is blatant vandalisn, attack pages, copyright violations) - see New pages patrol Josey Wales Parley 18:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks @Joseywales1961 Starman2377 (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
Vanamonde (Talk) 17:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protogen (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Protogen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Protogen Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Protogen reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

UGC
Hello Starman2377! Are you aware of Wikipedia's requirements regarding reliable sourcing? An element of that is that user generated content isn't acceptable (WP:UGC). This is why a draft such as Protogen can never be accepted. Sincerely —Alalch E. 19:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for clarifying. @Alalch E. Starman2377 (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Removing sourced information and edit summaries
Hi Starman2377, I just undid your unexplained removal of some stuff. Not sure why you took it out, since PC Gamer is very much considered a reliable source (see WP:VG/RS). It helps writing an edit summary, for your fellow editors, to see why you decided to do something. Hope this helps. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 21:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Im sorry about that i wanted to delete the text about the game having stealth elements (when it only has the option of taking out enemies with a QTE) and i thought that if i delete the text i should delete the source so it doesn't lead to information that isn't present anymore. Again, i apologize and will explain my edits more often. Starman2377 (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Starman2377, I've copy-pasted your reply to your talk page. To keep things tidy, please respond here. In case you need to notify me (or another editor), you can use and replace "username here" with the username of the person you're trying to notify.


 * You don't have to apologize, I assume good faith and think you're trying to improve the article. If you think the information is no longer up to date or just downright incorrect, look up a different source and add it, instead of removing another source. Then you can write something along the lines of "this was changed later in development" and add a source to back up your claim. In video games, development can change and certain features are removed or added later. So you might be right. If you want to find a reliable source, the WikiProject Video games (see WP:VG) has a very neat and researched list of sources considered reliable, at WP:VG/RS.


 * I nearly always leave an edit summary, even short ones like "ce" (short for copy-edit), so another experienced editor can see what I was trying to do. If it's more substantial, I leave a longer note and might point to relevant guidelines. There's also an option to enforce yourself to leave one: if you go to preferences and hit the "editing" tab, there should be an option to click "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary)". But again, edit summaries are completely optional.


 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Now you know how to reach me! Thanks, and happy editing. soetermans . ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:44, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

 * @7&6=thirteen Thank you. Starman2377 (talk) 16:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

April songs
Thank you for a barnstar! - My story today is about the Alchymic Quartet, - I went away from DYK but it's the last one from last year. - The songs are about vacation, pics not yet completely uploaded. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

The removal of the Brantley Foster quotation from the Catch-22 (logic) page
Hi there,

It looks like you removed the following:

An example is Brantley Foster in The Secret of My Success: "How can I get any experience until I get a job that gives me experience?"

From the aforementioned page.

I think that the quotation works well there as an easily understood example of the logical concept. I also happen to cite it and the page in some of my job applications (including the ones to the Wikimedia Foundation) so I find the removal inconvenient.

Was there a reason that this example was removed from the page?

Best wishes, Donald D. deRosier 2601:204:E580:1EE:C49E:4070:B9F3:5897 (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Reebok or nike" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reebok_or_nike&redirect=no Reebok or nike] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Inihaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm vinegar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)