User talk:Starnestommy

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hey,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * The Sandbox — A great place to experiment
 * WP:Village pump — A good place for help

While editing, please remember:
 * Be Bold, but not reckless in updating pages
 * No personal attacks: be upset with the contributions, not the contributor

You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.

For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing! Cbrown1023 21:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Japanese invasions of Korea
Could you explain your revert? (Wikimachine 02:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
 * Your edit was not encyclopedic in format. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 02:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How? (Wikimachine 03:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC))

About edit summary
I'm not sure you want to know this, but this means "Starnestommy Your mother has sex with a pig". This is a certain way to win a content dispute on Wikipedia. Grace notes T § 02:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Book collecting
I recently spent a few hours editing the book collecting article and you reverted my work using the PNG crusade bot. I'd like to know why you decided to revert my contributions. The article was in terrible need of editing, & most of my edits were simply wikifying and removing POV issues. I'll discuss this in WikiProject Books, because I feel my contributions significantly helped the article have a more NPOV stance than what you have reverted to. --'oac' (old american century) | Talk 04:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Overzealous vandalism reverts; that shade of red in RC tends to make me revert things. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 04:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Smith and Jones (Doctor Who)
Why did you revert my reversion of the IP address's edits? He was removing sections of the article. Macintosh User 19:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops. I revert things too quickly. I'll try not to do that in the future. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 19:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, no problem. Macintosh User 19:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Viridae Talk 00:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandal reverts
Please be more careful when reverting edits by other users as vandalism as you did here:. I had just closed the AfD for that article as keep, hence my removing the template. WjBscribe 00:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops... I guess I'm reverting too fast. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 00:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page!
Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page! I appreciate it. =) – Lantoka  (talk) 08:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

I hate vandals... --Starnestommy (Talk &bull; Contribs &bull; Uncyc) 23:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Joe Eigo
Why are you reverting legitimate edits? --81.179.113.175 02:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It was requested by Naconkantari in our IRC channel on freenode. -- 05:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Must have your autograph
I've noticed your work on Uncyclopedia. From the creation of Fisher Price you are one of the greatest wikiwriters of our time. That is why I MUST have you sign my Autograph page as soon as possible (seeing as there is a good chance you will be banned one day). If you could do me this favor, it would mean a lot to me. Kip the Dip 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry to disappoint you, but I did not write the article in question. It was, in fact, my brother Lstarnes who wrote it as a 12-year-old, although I did provide the inspiration for it by screaming "go eat shit fuckers" while I was watching a Fisher Price commercial. I'll try to contact him when I see him this weekend. -- 19:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright. Kip the Dip 16:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Famine
I got your message and agree with what your saying. I also remember reading a while back ago the begginer's guide and it specifically says "Administrators are not above the rules[4], even though they enforce them", and also blatantly violating Rule 2. I personally think he needs to be de-opped as well and wouldn't become an admin again without passing VFS.

Famine said on the ban patrol forum page "I have butted heads with both Manforman and Kip on numerous occasions, mainly because they were being unfunny shitheads who delight in harassing other users. I've banned them both numerous times, other admins have banned them, and each time they got some sort of weasely-ass probation from someone. If at all possible, I'd like them to stay off Uncyclopedia, since they are doing far more harm than good".

My reply:

Kip the Dip was mainly banned by Famine, he got a few joke bans from other admins, but nothing compared to Famine. I don't see how he was harmful and did anything worthy of an infiban.

I've written a number of articles in the past two months, more than Famine has and saying that is one of the most rediculous claims. I do not delight harassing users and I do not do it.

As much as I am pissed of with Radioactive afikomen for creating some of the sockpuppets, infinite is a bit over the top. He just wrote a featured article which proves that he is a good contributor, his ban should've been much shorter (i.e. a week or two).

I also recall Matt lobster was temporarily infi-banned, but I didn't see him do anything wrong besides his questionable revert.

I have other problems with Uncyc as well which include, extensive whoring, articles getting featured because of their author, not the actual content, and civilty. I do not have an interest in contributing to Famine's personal "website", and until things lighten up and idiocy ceases, I won't be on Uncyc (if unblocked).--Manforman 22:44, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of MICROS~1
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. meshach 20:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Starnestommy/Uncyclopedia Draft A
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Starnestommy/Uncyclopedia Draft A, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Starnestommy/Uncyclopedia Draft A is a test page. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Starnestommy/Uncyclopedia Draft A, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm. Since you had some involvement with the Qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)