User talk:StarryNightSky11/Archives/2022/April

"Insert into" ≠ "insert inside"
If you want us to discuss this at the article's talk page, I'm okay with doing so. But first, I thought to discuss this with you alone.

At the sexual intercourse article, you made edits 1 and 2. I undid them twice. After I undid your edit the first time, with an edit summary to provide my reason for changing it back to the original word, why did you add "inside" again and without explaining your reason for doing so? Why do you think "inside" is better? The sources use constructions "insert" or "insertion" and "into" to describe the act, but I haven't seen constructions that use "insert" and "inside" for the act. I've noticed that you also use "inside" instead of "inside of" for your change. Maybe you would like the two of us or people at the article's talk page to consult grammar guides for this? I've looked into "insert inside" and cannot find standard use of this construction or encouragement for it. Enlightenedstranger0 (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)