User talk:StarryNightSky11/Archives/2023/May

Ethel Cain
can we please just delete the white silas stuff from the ethel cain page and be done with it? some of that information isn't even accurate. pretty much everyone who makes music has music from before they made it big, and almost nobody has that stuff listed in such detail on their wikipedia page. it's unnecessary, especially given the fact that it's all been deleted from the internet and won't ever be officially posted again 47.55.151.222 (talk) 22:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * If you have a source to back that up feel free to make the relevant changes. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  22:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * i've talked to hayden personally and she's told me that apologetics isn't even a project by her and she doesn't know where that came from (the reference is a broken soundcloud link). she also said she doesn't want any of the white silas stuff on the page - i know conflict of interest editing isn't allowed or whatever, but seriously - there is absolutely no reason at all to be listing all this stuff, even if she did want it up there. irrelevant to the ethel cain project 38.20.197.121 (talk) 01:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Information is held here as encyclopaedic content, if there is an issue, it would need to be discussed on the articles talk page. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  01:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Unexplained deletions
Hi there. I noticed that you rightfully reverted an unexplained mass deletion recently. I have done the same thing to several dozen incidents by the same editor. They have since reverted all of mine back, again without explanation. I have tried to look at the original deletions to find some reason behind them, and in almost all cases I've come up empty. I have also left a note/warning on the editor's talk page, obviously to no avail (they reverted all of my fixes after I left the note on their talk page). I don't want to get into an edit-war situation, even as I know the editor is reverting me acrimoniously, so I thought I would bring it to your attention, as you are a massively experienced editor who has seen an example of the editor in question's work. Any advice, guidance, aid, etc. would be appreciated, as I am not entirely sure what to do at this point. Anwegmann (talk) 18:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, yeah I can find it annoying at times, but it's best to keep a cool head, for editors it's always advisable to leave an edit summary when making significant changes to an article, when not doing so it can feel disruptive, best to avoid edit wars as it leads nowhere good, best idea would be to make a report at the vandalism noticeboard when the editing pattern has become disruptive, if warnings have gone unheeded or ignored. Hope this helps. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  23:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Kōjien
Why did you revert my edit? Did you read the edit summary? 76.14.122.5 (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It didn't appear constructive to me, and was identified as a test edit and/or vandalism by another user. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  00:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. I reverted that revert because, as I said in the edit summary for that revert, my original edit was neither a test edit nor vandalism. Did you read the edit summary of my original edit to the article? 76.14.122.5 (talk) 00:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I did, I reverted the edit as another user had used software which identified it as a test edit or vandalism, and your revert contained the same content which was identified. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  00:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The software was wrong. It was neither a test edit nor vandalism. I deleted the lists in the article because I considered them to violate WP:NOTCATALOG, as I stated in the original edit summary 76.14.122.5 (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

I want new page of last name.
Please help me. 103.220.81.227 (talk) 11:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you explain further what you would like assistance with? Thanks. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  22:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Please explain your use of rollback
Hi, please explain why made both this and this revert on Sunday. Many thanks — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 21:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Rollback wasn't used. I used Twinkle to revert an edit which had been made without explanation. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  20:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No, you reintroduced what was probably drive-by vandalism by . Please be more careful. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 21:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hadn't heard of that, cheers for the heads up. -- StarryNightSky11   ☎  22:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

What contributions?
Hi, StarryNightSky11. In the past half hour or so, you have welcomed five new users to Wikipedia and thanked them for their contributions, even though they haven't made any contributions. I hope you will try find a relevant welcome template to use for such people instead. A message that doesn't fit them will hardly make them feel very personally welcomed. Bishonen &#124; tålk 22:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC).