User talk:StarsandStripes

August 2017
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Art Renewal Center has an edit summary that is inaccurate. The summaries are hel mypful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Edits such as this  freshacconci  (✉) 00:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Fresh, I'm reverting back to YOUR version. David Gerard added a crapton of spam. I don't know why. StarsandStripes (talk) 00:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Tornado chaser know (talk) 00:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Art Renewal Center.  freshacconci  (✉) 00:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Just to be clear, Fresh insulted me first. StarsandStripes (talk) 00:40, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That doesn't mean your allowed to insult him Tornado chaser (talk) 00:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Spam
See WP:SPAM, tags are not spam, if you have any questions feel free to ask me. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Tornado, Too much content was removed from this article. Too much spam was added. It looks ridiculous. Which version do you think looks cleaner?StarsandStripes (talk) 00:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Have you read WP:SPAM? tags are not spam. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Tornado chaser (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

1 or 2 tags are not spam. But 30 tags? Why so many? Also, why remove 90% of the article? StarsandStripes (talk) 01:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. S warm  ♠  04:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)