User talk:Startarrant

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yobol. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit-warring
There was no "edit-warring" going on. The article was biased and inaccurate, which really surprised me because I usually find Wiki info very interesting, easy to access and helpful (one of the reasons I stop to edit and improve an article when I can) and as a review of my edits shows, I tried to improve the Orthomolecular article without deleting salvageable text (even if I thought the "salvageable" text was awkwardly worded). I wasn't as familiar at that time with referencing and my edits would be improved with references but I have not bothered to improve the section because it took considerable time and thought to "improve" the article the first time, only to end in reversion without any prior discussion of the improvements and merits. Because the internet has some excellent sites (including all the Nobel Prize references to the 2X winning Father of Orthomolecular Medicine) the biased and inaccurate Wiki page just gives readers a bad impression of Wiki -- as they click out and move on to more accurate and informative sources). Wiki is only as good as its editors/authors and I think that is why Wiki has a hard time raising money to keep Wiki going. Startarrant (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)startarrant

-- reply to extremely biased edit warriors below

Your recent editing history at orthomolecular medicine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MastCell Talk 19:19, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Orthomolecular medicine with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yintan ²  19:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Orthomolecular medicine with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seed of the woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of David. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franciscan Minims of the Perpetual Help of Mary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capuchin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nuesta Madre 01.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nuesta Madre 01.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ron h jones (Talk) 00:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

The Principle
Hi there. Please cite sources when adding content to Wikipedia. Your additions to The Principle were lengthy original research and thus have been undone. Sam Walton (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franciscan Minims of the Perpetual Help of Mary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capuchin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Name of God
Thanks for the note. I meant the Talk:God page. It sounds like you think the I Am that I Am should change its name, but that article does say that it is "the common English translation..." In any case, you will need really good sources saying that "I Am Who Am" is the better translation. StAnselm (talk) 12:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

No more infoboxes
For being a person of "God", you sure do lie thru your teeth and love deceit.

Stop emailing and bothering me. Stop leaving messages on my talk page. Stop adding the infobox. Stop with the copyright problems. Stop saying "Our Lord" and "Our God" in the article. This is not your personal page to play with. I'm not going to help anymore as I don't take well to lies and harassment. Bgwhite (talk) 05:33, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Nativity and Perpetual Help of Mary.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Nativity and Perpetual Help of Mary.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rev Mother Maria Concepcion of the Perpetual Help of Mary 1971.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of María Concepción Zúñiga López


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on María Concepción Zúñiga López requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Programming G E E K (mah page! // use words to communicate page) 23:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of María Concepción of the Nativity and the Perpetual Help of Mary


The article María Concepción of the Nativity and the Perpetual Help of Mary has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Only her own book is the reference for the article. There needs to be multiple, independent and reliable sources about here.  Her book doesn't count as it is not independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of María Concepción of the Nativity and the Perpetual Help of Mary for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article María Concepción of the Nativity and the Perpetual Help of Mary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/María Concepción of the Nativity and the Perpetual Help of Mary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Sons of Thunder June 6 1970 Michael Schwartz.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sons of Thunder June 6 1970 Michael Schwartz.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MSchwartz 6-6-1970.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do not reupload the image to circumvent the closed discussion. Edits like this will not have any traction. You posted on the image this image is my own work; source no longer exists; etc—if so, you need documentation of owning the image, since it is clearly a scan from another source and you have not explained how you hold the copyright. (It doesn't fall under fair use, public domain, wiki commons public photo, etc.) The image likely belongs to its photographer or the originating newspaper unless it has been expressly transferred. If you hold the copyright, email your consent and open license declaration from an official email. If you don't hold the copyright, then you can't publish it under a free license. Eye close font awesome.svg czar  13:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

I really need the vandalization of this page/photo ended: The discussion and action taken on the talk page for the site is clear --


 * Sfan00 -- I MAY have located the "source" problem as the wizard did not indicate this info was required and I uploaded the file using the wiki wizard which clearly specifies the copyright and content are public domain wiki common usage and yes, I created that particular file from archive material that is also within my own publishing company's copyright domain but the photo belongs to universal historic material that is public domain and wiki common usage. Therefore, I don't even limit it to my copyright privileges. I thought that when we upload using the wiki wizard that the wizard shows the copyright status and that it would also show that I created the content and uploaded it (as it must since you contacted me).


 * But I am not an expert and would appreciate any help that fits my pay grade so that that photo is not "vandalized" by deletions when it is clearly apropos to the subject and readership of that wiki page and content. I've used the wizard several times and I thought I got it right this time and that there would be no confusion about the public domain wiki common usage nature of the photo. I hope I have clarified any "source" questions as both the publication and photographer no longer exist. (This is the only hotlink that directs me to any substantive person or discussion on this matter.) Thanks, Sfan00 for your interest and help. I hope my edits have resolved the matter and there is no need for any further bother over this. Readers of wiki pages (myself included) appreciate all the effort that page editors muster to make wiki the accurate, complete, excellent and the "instant" resource internet users expect. As a part-time editor, I appreciate any help and corrections to make my edits as accurate and complete as possible Startarrant (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2016
 * (UTC) startarrant Startarrant (talk) 12:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

I will redo yet another form and upload but all of the previous have been correct and sufficient as per the very clear explanations. So vandalism by bots that cannot read or think and any others needs to stop. I don't think the template on the discussion page is necessary for this but I will submit the email since artificial intelligence does not seem to be able to accept what is clearly acceptable for all other similar public domain photos on wiki pages -- but IF more dots and tittles or template emails are needed for ai comfort and an END to ai vandalism ... Startarrant (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charles-Éléonore Dufriche-Desgenettes


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Charles-Éléonore Dufriche-Desgenettes, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  01:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * We do not use inter-wiki redirects between this Wiki and Wikis of other languages (or of any other website). Please try translating the content and creating an article in English, and we will certainly appreciate it. Thanks! ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia  ᐐT₳LKᐬ  01:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)