User talk:Starwarrior1221/sandbox

peer review
1. On Kruger National Park I would add what is maybe a very brief sentence as just a summary. Also add an internal hyperlink for that Kruger National Park if there is a wiki page for that topic. 2. I would also add more on breed background. the one sentence makes the page look a little unbalanced. You could add more about where they are seen in the world today. How they were decided to be used as working dogs. If you can't find anymore information maybe just delete that subsection and add the sentence into the introduction or somewhere else. 3. You've done a good job on adding subsections that covers all aspects of the topic. I would just add more information because each section has very little information. Arciss (talk) 17:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I did not want to add any information about Kruger National Park because I don't think it is relevant to add it to the article when it has its own article. This could be the same for the breed background section but I thought it was important to list why these kinds of dogs are great for working dogs. I would love to add more information to this article and I have tried to find more reliable sources with more information but there is nothing more that I could add without losing my neutrality.Starwarrior1221 (talk) 16:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
The subsection called breed background is very short and does not include a citation. I would add a citation into this section to ensure that the information within this article seems more credible and maybe expand more on the background of the breed so that the article has more balanced information. Is there information that you can add about the exchange program that his mother was sent to? I would add more in-text citations to this article. Perhaps Kruger National Park or PDSA Gold Medal can be cited if the articles exist. The subsection titled "Handler" does not contain any information. If no information is added, I would delete this subheading. Overall, this article is well done. The lead within this article summarizes the majority of what the article is about. The facts provided in this article are well covered on many sources and the sources are used well. AEMMM15 (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I did add more information to the breed background and also added a citation. I could not find any reliable information on the exchange program as the name of the program was not given. I went through and added more internal links while also deleting the handler section. I had a book that was ordered that would give me more information on his handler but it has not arrived yet.Starwarrior1221 (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)