User talk:Starwars404

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you are possessed with Star Wars fandom, you may want to check out Wookieepedia, the Star Wars encyclopedia.

Again, welcome! Gman 124 talk 17:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jared Wignall
A tag has been placed on Jared Wignall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paragon12321 (talk) 01:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stu Macher
A tag has been placed on Stu Macher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Editing problems
Hi Starwars404,

Having reviewed your edits to Wikipedia, I'm afraid I've noticed several serious issues with your editing, including spelling errors, unsourced and speculative information, creation of spurious (non-notable) pages and other problems. I would advise that you seek guidance on talk pages from more experienced editors before making any further edits. I would also advise that you do not create any more pages. If you continue to edit without adding value to the encyclopedia, while at the same time creating a lot of work for other editors to fix, remove and cleanup your edits, your ability to edit Wikipedia may be restricted. Thanks,  Dei z  talk 08:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

February 2009
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Other Notes
{| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
 * valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em" | Artículo bueno.svg
 * style="padding: 0.1em" |
 * style="padding: 0.1em" |