User talk:Starwik

Welcome!
Hello, Starwik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Regarding your draft
Wikipedia isn't a reliable source. Further, all non-trivial information must be backed by Sources independent from the subject. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

My First Article
Hello Jannik Schwaß, thank you for your Welcome message and useful links. It's a little difficult for me at the beginning, i will try to make less mistakes. Regarding to external references i will add them ongoing. Thank you one more time! Starwik (talk) 21:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem, we were all new at some point, I've only noticed that problem in you draft and wanted to bring it to your attention because the AFC backlog is currently about4 months; which can be frustrating if you indeed have to wait that long and it's not accepted. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Moon-bot


A tag has been placed on Draft:Moon-bot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 22:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Hello creffett, The arguments that "this is a promotion/advertising article" can be applied to almost ANY article about ANY commercial software in Wikipedia. The article itself was created using nearly the same structure as MetaTrader article. Why then article about MetaTrader is published: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaTrader_4 ? Second, i tried to follow your recommendation to contest the speedy deletion, but i didn't find such a button, please, i want to improve the article in accordance with all Wikipedia, guide. Thank you!Starwik (talk) 20:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)