User talk:StaticTrek

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!) ''' Hello, StaticTrek, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Learn from others
 * Be kind to others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us a bit about yourself
 * Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ( ~ ); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ChrisP
Hello StaticTrek,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ChrisP for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Hoaxes on Wikipedia
Love the movie and the scene but please refrain from making hoaxes on Wikipedia, dude. Abide by our rules.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * You spoke of him as a real person. It would have been clearer if you'd said "is a fictional character in . . .". I doubt that he would met notability requirements though. It's hard to establish notability for fictional characters. That you created the thing three times despite the thing being deleted was quite disruptive. What other areas of interest would you like to edit about? If you can affirm you won't recreate the deleted article and show you can edit constructively, I'm sure Oshwah would be happy to unblock you. Any further article creations should be via WP:AfC or the WP:article wizard to avoid problems and pitfalls. Hope this helps Cheers, and happy editing.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for helping, I didn't understand what the removals were about until you wrote this, have a nice day. -StaticTrek

March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at ChrisP, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Unblock Reason

 * Can you please explain the article entirely here? Those repeated article creations clearly appeared to be disruptive... please let me know if I missed something.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I will stick to making non fictional articles, I completely understand the reason you blocked me, I didn't understand what the removal of the page was about, I thought it might have been a bug or something so I kept recreating it, sorry for the confusion but I understand now. -StaticTrek