User talk:Status/2013/06

Please comment on Talk:Edwin Jarvis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Edwin Jarvis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Stars Dance
You undid the redirect, but didn't provide any sources. There's no source in the article confirming a tracklist or release data. The closest there is is https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/stars-dance/id656454307 but that's a dead link: no album exists at that link. Why did you undo the redirect?&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox halftime show
Template:Infobox halftime show has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Jennifer Lopez discography, look it!
Look it 89 on the French Charts

Infobox
Per Template:Infobox single, you only include information on the original/first version of a song. That's why remixes usually get a separate section/infobox, we include the first album that the song was released on, the length of the first version as that's what the track listing/format section of an article is for. same principle with album infoboxes, you only include the length of the standard edition even if the deluxe is different. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  21:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Talk:Pusher Love Girl/GA1
See Talk:Pusher Love Girl/GA1 review. Robin (talk) 21:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * New message on the review page. Robin (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Encore Robin (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * One query left; Talk:Pusher_Love_Girl/GA1. Robin (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Illusive Man
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Illusive Man. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Give It Up to Me
As per Sanity.com.au, the cover in the article was the one used for the international CD single for "Give It Up to Me". Per the principles of WP:NFCC, where multiple covers exist the one which is more difficult to explain in words and thus more detrimental to the understanding and identification of the article is most significant. Since the cover you're adding is just words etc. it makes more sense to use the cover that has an image of Shakira on it. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  11:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Scratch that. apparently the full international CD single was scrapped and limited one was released instead. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Viva Móvil
The DYK project (nominate) 19:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Reissue albums
Category:Reissue albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Red (Taylor Swift album) infobox
I hate to bring this up again, since you ignored my last message and undid my edit here again:, but what is the harm in having (exec.) added to the infobox next to Scott Borchetta's name. Are removing it because it looks ugly or something? If it is informative to the reader, appearance should not matter. Having a hidden text saying that he is an executive producer, hardly serves any real purpose at all. Just looking at the infobox without going into the editing text (to see the hidden "executive producer" text), any casual reader is going to think that Borchetta is a regular record producer, which he is not, which is even further evidenced by going to the track listing and seeing that he is not one of the actual record producers. I would just like a solid straightforward answer from you, if you don't mind. QuasyBoy (talk)  16:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe I already stated that we don't say "Name (music)" in the infobox. What is the difference? The "Producer" field itself links to an article that says "Today, the recording industry has two kinds of producers: executive producer and music producer". If we're going to denote the executive producer, then music producer would have to as well.  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 16:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The wikilink to the article Record producer, which is in all the album infoboxes in Wikipedia, is primarily about the role of the record producer, not executive producers, who only handle the business side of the album being made. This is why I am singling out Borchetta of all the producers in the infobox, because he is not an actual record producer like Jeff Bhasker, Nathan Chapman, etc., who actually produced songs for the album. If you insist on not letting it be shown that Borchetta is an exec to actually differentiate from the other record producers on the album, his name should just be removed altogether, and leave the actual record producers in the infobox. QuasyBoy (talk)  17:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, there are two types of record producers; executive and music producer. Scott is an executive (who oversees the process of every song), while Jeff and Nathan are music.  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 17:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand that, but when the casual reader sees Borchetta's name listed in the producer parameter, they are going to think that he a regular producer like Bhasker and Chapman. Which is why "(exec.)" has been used for years in Wikipedia, to differentiate between execs and regular record producers. QuasyBoy (talk)  17:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

CFD
Hello; you recently participated in a discussion about Category:Reissue albums, which I closed as "no consensus". The category has now been re-nominated for deletion; you may be interested in participating in this second nomination. The discussion is here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Cold Case Love GA review
Hi, I've reviewed Cold Case Love, and have made suggestions for improvements on its review page. I've placed it on hold for 7 days.  Et  3   rnal  17:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cold Case Love
The DYK project (nominate) 08:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Drowning Girl/archive1
As the WP:GAN reviewer, I was hoping you might care to comment at Featured article candidates/Drowning Girl/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Flickr
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Flickr. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles discography
Thank you for sorting that out! Wikitables are like another language! :-) —JennKR | ☎ 23:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Haha, no problem at all!  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 23:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Link?
Could you please link me to those discussions? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 04:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have replied. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * How is WDYLM a single now? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Any chance for a review?
Sorry to bother you but this FAC has been up since April 21 and I was wondering if you would be kind enough to leave a review? It would be very much appreciated. Best, jona  talk to me  19:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Delivered at 12:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

I am not attacking ... I just want to know
What is exactly your problem with me since day 1? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't have a problem with you, I have a problem with your actions of making (how it seems) every less-successful single of Beyonce a "promo single". Beyoncé Knowles discography being at FLC gave a opportunity to make such corrections, and the nominator of the article was in agreement on the matters.  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 17:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Would you deem "Green Light" a single or a promo single? It was only released digitally, not to radio or CD single. Same as "Daddy"... <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 17:39, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You know very well that this is false > "making (how it seems) every less-successful single of Beyonce a 'promo single'". Calling "Dadday" a single is beyond ridiculous. No word can qualify this. The world know "Crazy in Love" as the lead single and "Baby Boy" was the follow up. There no point in having a conversation with you. Goodbye and thanks for making of each and every second I spent here unpleasant. But you won't experience this pleasure anymore. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

A generic barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Robin!! <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 17:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you so much! <font face="Arial" size="2em"> —  Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 17:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Request
I was wondering if you could possibly vote at Featured list candidates/List of songs in Glee (season 1)/archive1. Robin (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Safe & Sound (Taylor Swift song)
When you move a page, don't forget to fix the inbound links. There are still a ton of links to Safe & Sound (song) that need fixing. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm on it. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 04:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Mi Reflejo track lsiting
Hey Zac! The music credits was removed per the GA review. Erick (talk) 05:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like the reviewer isn't fully aware of how credits work, and has only ever seen the "Writers: Name, Name, Name" type of credits. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 05:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:House of Cards (U.S. TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Pixar short films collection
Hello! I noticed that you reverted the name change on Pixar Short Films Collection: Volume 1, and used Disney.com as a reference. But just because they abbreviate the title on their website, does not mean that it should be abbreviated on Wikipedia. The same website omits the word "Volume" altogether for the second set, yet both DVD sets clearly have the word spelled out on the cover. Plus, you had even named the article that yourself before reverting it! In order to be consistent with Pixar Short Films Collection: Volume 2, the article name should be changed back to "Pixar Short Films Collection: Volume 1". Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 18:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

DYK for The Only Promise That Remains
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Did It Again
Hi Status, While editing Did It Again, I had an edit conflict, and later on while checking the edit history I noticed it might have been with you. I didn't try to revert you, but I had edited the article to fix problems laid out by Divaknockouts in the talk page. Your edits have The edits you made removed my new adjustments :3 What do we do to make both our edits fit? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 02:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright; thank you for the explanation. My apologizes. Edit conflicts are the worst! I'll try to comb through it and fix it. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 03:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think everything's alright now. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 03:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Uhm not exactly! I redid the ones you missed anyway! It's alright now! Thank you! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 03:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

I Am... World Tour
A year ago when I nominated I Am... World Tour (album) as a GA its name was only I Am... World Tour. Then, several months later, a user changed the name of the tour from I Am... Tour to I Am... World Tour and the name of the album was changed from I Am... World Tour to I Am... World Tour (album). Now when I nominated the tour article for GA, it shows the review of the album. Do you know what should I do? My love is love (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks like this has been corrected by another user. <font face="Arial" size="2em"> —  Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 03:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Content dispute
Hi. Would you care to comment at this discussion over whether the phrase "rave reviews" should be removed from an article? It's much ado about nothing, but stubbornness persists. Dan56 (talk) 14:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of (Drop Dead) Beautiful
The article (Drop Dead) Beautiful you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:(Drop Dead) Beautiful for comments about the article. Well done! Sorry about the long, strange trip :-); congratulations and all the best,  Mini  apolis  14:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Combining lead singles with featured singles
Can I ask you why you've been combining lead singles with featured singles in artists' discography pages? Is this a new guideline? Thanks. JayJ47 (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)