User talk:StePAhi

Speedy deletion nomination of Meili Cady
Hello StePAhi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meili Cady for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Diagear (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meili Cady
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Diagear (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Meili Cady for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meili Cady is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Meili Cady until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  01:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Meili Cady. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Join WikiProject Microsoft!
 Why don't you join WikiProject Microsoft? It seems that you have been editing Microsoft-related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, Web-based sites and applications, its important people, and share interests regarding Microsoft. This WikiProject is in the process of being revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Add your name to the list at WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox. Thanks! STJMLCC (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

PROD
You can't restore a PROD tag once it has been contested, as per the instructions: "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a proposed deletion/dated tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith." You do not have to agree with my rationale, but you cannot keep re-adding the tag. That isn't how PROD works. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Your recent editing history at Katja Glieson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  01:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  01:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Remove of PROD tags
Once the tag has been removed it cannot be replaced. The next step would be to nominate the article for deletion using the WP:AfD process. ... disco spinster   talk  01:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * See WP:AFDHOWTO for the procedure. ... disco spinster   talk  01:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Broadwell (microarchitecture), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. Please stop adding stuff like "This is the first core i7...." to micro architecture articles. Those articles are about micro architectures, not about the Core i7 processor. After all those micro architectures are not just used in Core "i" series processors. So refrain from making edits like that. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith  (talk)  19:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)