User talk:Stealthy Cricket

November 2020
Hello, I'm ThadeusOfNazereth. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Mark Hancock have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 00:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

What was not relevant? Stealthy Cricket (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Unlock CUPE Wiki for me please :-)) Stealthy Cricket (talk) 00:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

You are confused. Edits like this have no place on an encyclopedia. We aren't interested in your opinion (nor of my opinion); see WP:NOR. It looks like you don't really understand Wikipedia. Please step back and read our policies and guidelines before editing any further, because you are likely to be blocked if you continue making edits like those you've been making. --Yamla (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

It’s not an opinion. Indeed it is fact backed up by supporting documents and completely relevant. You step back and read the Wiki policies and stop removing legit edits. Stealthy Cricket (talk) 19:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * "Either way Mark Hancock, National President of CUPE, should not use a word like bastard when describing anyone. It shows a lack of professionalism and poor leadership." <-- that is your personal opinion. That has no place here. --Yamla (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Got yah. Okay. Will put Wiki edit back up without “personal opinion” so it won’t be taken down. Stealthy Cricket (talk) 20:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Note also that your time here has been extremely disruptive. You'll need to demonstrate you are willing to take a very different approach going forward, if you wish to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You are incorrect in your assumption of disruption. An encyclopedia, including Wikipedia, is full of what can be called disruptive content as an individual reader can be disrupted by certain content though another reader is not. Please stop chasing me and remind yourself that content being added to Wiki has been cited with actual none disruptive documentation that is real and factual and included Government files. Thank you. Stealthy Cricket (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Some anonymous ip addy based editor removes content being added to Wiki that’s cited with actual none disruptive documentation that is real and factual and included Government files and Wiki admin make no fuss.. That is truly chilling to any editor. The “legal” as you call it will be removed. Stealthy Cricket (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Stealthy Cricket (talk) 01:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Stealthy Cricket (talk) 19:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

One open unblock request at a time, please. You have two. Which one do you wish to be reviewed? And note, there's no timeline here. Admins are volunteers and will not respond to your demands around timelines. --Yamla (talk) 19:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

I try hard to do deleting request of 331dot but no work as being blocked to undo edits. No demands timelines of course when volunteers busy. Stealthy Cricket (talk) 19:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You haven't answered my question. Which unblock request do you want to be reviewed? Also, I advised you to address your disruptive editing, but seem to be doubling down and claiming that your editing was perfectly fine. That's okay, you are free to take that approach, I'm just warning you it will almost certainly fail. --Yamla (talk) 19:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Note also that your time here has been extremely disruptive. You'll need to demonstrate you are willing to take a very different approach going forward, if you wish to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

The above block please. Edits with correct documents links to back those edits to correct incorrect information at Wikipedia should be left alone. Example: Mark Hancock is not a union member, but is a Union lobbyist <<< backed up with Government website >>> https://lobbycanada.gc.ca/app/secure/ocl/lrs/do/vwRg?cno=262582&regId=878089

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stealthy Cricket (talk • contribs)
 * Rather than pick which one of two open unblock requests you wished to be reviewed, you filed a third unblock request. And you did so without addressing your disruptive editing. On the basis of WP:CIR, I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review whichever of your unblock requests they think is most directly appropriate. If they decline your unblock request, you may subsequently use WP:UTRS to contest your block. You must wait until after your current unblock requests are reviewed, however. --Yamla (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Concern regarding Draft:Canadian Staff Union
Hello, Stealthy Cricket. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Canadian Staff Union, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)