User talk:Steam Heat

Welcome
 Hello, Steam Heat, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Steam Heat, good luck, and have fun. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 22:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Angelic 2 the Core has been reverted. Your edit here to Angelic 2 the Core was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3E0kq9YkjA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:57, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Angelic 2 the Core shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Book of Daniel (album) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:12, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Book of Daniel (album) was changed by Steam Heat (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-08-09T18:12:39+00:00.
 * Hello everybody (mods), it is me. S A N T I A G O (Pamtri reference). Steam Heat is back at it again with IP address 75.102.202.77. Please reference the The Book of Daniel (album) page's recent edits, it is consistent with the vitriol and needless condescension of the Steam Heat sock puppet. 2605:A601:54A8:39:651A:28EE:4115:3E49 (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Again, not seeing the forest for the trees. Steam Heat (talk) 19:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Steam Heat, if you don't respond to the report and agree to wait for consensus you are risking a block. You seem to be warring about The Book of Daniel (album). I see four obvious reverts by you and one large removal of content since 14 August. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Silent Sam
I've undone your edits here. Regarding 'is' vs 'was', not a huge deal but consensus at the moment seems to be to leave it as 'is' as the statue still exists, just isn't on display.

However, changing 'Confederate' to 'slaver' is inappropriate insertion of a point of view. Please read WP:NPOV and endeavour to keep your contributions to Wikipedia encyclopedic. TSP (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * "The Confederacy fought to protect slavery" isn't exactly an opinionated statement, but I understand. Steam Heat (talk) 15:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeed, and that's extensively covered later in the article; but that's different to just replacing "Confederate soldier" with "slaver soldier" in the lead of an article describing a statue. TSP (talk) 16:52, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Block notice

 * In addition to these accounts, there has been a lot of logged out editing going on.
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * —DoRD (talk)​ 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.